srividya_c's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
47282466 | over 8 years ago | Hi baldovinoi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Looks like you are adding buildings in this area, but the way you have traced buildings are not correct. Buildings should be traced as polygons(square) and not line in the middle. Here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPJz-AucqF4) is the video on how to add buildings. Please let me know if you have any question. As these buildings were not well traced I have reverted your changes. Happy Mapping. |
47229879 | over 8 years ago | Oh never knew this. Will make sure I keep an eye on this node. Thank you for sharing. |
46125467 | over 8 years ago | Hi Gmstv9, Looks like you changed a building to water body in this changeset. I have reverted your edit osm.org/changeset/47220901. Please make sure you dont make edits like this. Thanks |
47197159 | over 8 years ago | Hi nawsken, Looks like you added non-existing features in the middle of the sea. Please contribute valuable map data which exists on ground. I have reverted your edit in changeset #47199590. Thank you |
46303399 | over 8 years ago | Hi panoramedia, Looks like you are deleting place names in name:en tag. Is there any reason to delete these English names? I have fixed few of these changes in #47120579 changeset. Can you please not delete English names until they are not correct. Thanks |
30346989 | over 8 years ago | Hi CloCkWeRX, Thank you for flagging this changeset. We have reverted changeset 30347008 which created the duplicates and cleaned up the area. The main source we used to trace these buildings was Mapbox Imagery. As a local mapper, it would be great if you verify these buildings existence and provide feedback. |
47078716 | over 8 years ago | @zhackney and @ j03lar50n
@zhackney do improve the existing highways and not delete them if it exists in imagery. |
46138349 | over 8 years ago | Great wgruzek. I didn't name it as I was unsure of it. You can name it if you know the name exactly based on your local knowledge. Thanks. |
46138349 | over 8 years ago | Hi wgruzek, Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. Looks like you have retraced this island but you have not given the right tagging combination. Please follow osm.wiki/Tag:place%3Dislet wiki to know how to trace islands. I have made changes in my changeset #46156705. Please refer and let me know if you have questions. Thank you. |
45513306 | over 8 years ago | Hi Ivan, Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. Looks like you have added many fire-hydrants with your name in this changeset. I have partially reverted this changeset by removing the fire-hydrants and ref tags added by you in the following changesets : #46128235, #46128194, #46128115, #46128088.
Thank you
|
46088680 | over 8 years ago | Hi VillageofWolves, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The sidewalks you deleted in this changeset are visible in the Satellite imagery. Your changeset comment says these are not connected. Can you explain why you deleted these sidewalks instead of connecting them to other neighbouring roads? |
45561429 | over 8 years ago | Hi mastermon, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your changes to OpenStreetMap looks good. Changeset will be very descriptive if you provide proper changeset comment writing the changes you did rather than the comment you specify. Please follow best practices of changeset commnents here - osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments 안녕하세요 mastermon, OpenStreetMap에 기여해 주셔서 감사합니다. OpenStreetMap에 대한 변경 사항이 좋았습니다. 변경 집합은 사용자가 지정한 설명이 아닌 변경 한 내용을 적절한 변경 집합 주석으로 제공하면 매우 유용합니다. 변경 세트 사용자 모범 사례를 따르십시오. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
45796574 | over 8 years ago | Hi oooppp, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The building you have added in this changeset is not matching with any of the Satellite imagery. Can you specify what source you used to add and modify these buildings? Thanks |
45881623 | over 8 years ago | Hi T mohan, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I think you have deleted a wood cover in this changeset where its clearly visible in Satellite imagery. Is there any reason behind deleting this? Happy to help. srividya_c |
45231196 | over 8 years ago | Hi fayor, Looks like you have deleted many service and residential roads in this changeset which are visible in Satellite imagery. Is there any reason for these deletions? Sembra che avete cancellato molti servizi e strade residenziali che sono visibili nelle immagini satellitari. C'è qualche ragione di queste eliminazioni? Thanks |
41660269 | almost 9 years ago | Hi Viajero Perdido, Thank you for reverting. I think made a wrong fix for the multipolygon based on OSM-Inspector error. Will make sure that these mistakes don't happen. Thank you taking care of this. |
41187225 | almost 9 years ago | Sorry, wrong changeset link: here is the changeset where I reverted the changes : osm.org/changeset/41607155 |
41187225 | almost 9 years ago | Hi pnorman, I was not able to understand this, as the bridleway which you said comes to left and not to right. I have reverted my changeset (osm.org/changeset/41605755) which added that restriction. Can you please add the right turn-restriction in that junction. Thank you. |
41187225 | almost 9 years ago | Hi pnorman, The restriction board was saying `no_right_turn at Camosun`. I had the same confusion when I saw this sign board. We got this confirmed from a local mapper though our public mapping ticket (refer here: https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/213#issuecomment-236818740) and then the restriction was added. PS : I think you tooking the mapillary image sequence in this area in 2015. Let me know if I have missed anything in understanding this restriction. Thank you :) |
39909316 | about 9 years ago | Hi, You have been moving single node from US to Europe over seas. I came across 4-5 of your changesets which follow the same pattern. Can you please explain what happened to cause this edit? I am reverting this changeset-39909316. Comment on this if you have any questions. |