syntex's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
98312518 | over 4 years ago | I am trying to fix this right now |
98076378 | over 4 years ago | A da się tam teraz przejechać samochodem? Bo jedną z tych dróg trzeba usunąć |
98076378 | over 4 years ago | Hmm, ale teraz ulica Cyraneczki jest podwójnie. Nie powinno tak być |
98207891 | over 4 years ago | Zgadza się |
98146548 | over 4 years ago | Kilkanaście budynków ci się skasowało https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=98146548 |
98124714 | over 4 years ago | *L23 |
98122214 | over 4 years ago | *L17, L19 |
98121756 | over 4 years ago | *L12, L13 |
98040076 | over 4 years ago | Ale jeszcze niektórzy używają tą nazwę czy już nie? |
97925753 | over 4 years ago | This part is currently not under construction |
97925753 | over 4 years ago | Ale ten odcinek nie jest w budowie. Nawet nie ma jeszcze pozwolenia na budowę |
82380035 | over 4 years ago | No tak :P Chociaż po tagu ele można rozróżnić |
82380035 | over 4 years ago | Zresztą tag hill też zakłada, że wzgórze jest naturalne |
82380035 | over 4 years ago | Ok, zróbmy tak jak zrobiłeś na Kopie Cwila. Dodam tag tourism=viewpoint |
82380035 | over 4 years ago | Niekoniecznie, peak jest dopuszczalne. na wiki nawet jest natural=peak - the summit of a hill or mountain a hill jest rzadko używane i nie renderuje się na mapie |
97152093 | over 4 years ago | Building:levels=12 dla jakiegoś kiosku? i to nie jest building=detached tylko building=retail |
97220925 | over 4 years ago | To nie lepiej usunąć? |
97405678 | over 4 years ago | I've downloaded all of them, that is why I am surprised. I only got the usual errors about the religious_administration areas (building role in the relation-place of worship). I had to download all of them, because I've been adding the exact shape of these borders. For example - Radiowo now has almost all new borders that were added in my changesets. You can check that here http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=11191068 And that page shows that you've deleted one member of that relation and fixed the continuity. BUT I've checked all the relations and they had no problems with the continuity (I remember checking the Radiowo relation aswell). I downloaded all members and also the whole area where they are. So I don't know how JOSM had not showed me the error message before sending the changeset (also no sign of broken continuity in the edit relation window, everything was fine) |
97405678 | over 4 years ago | That is weird that there was an unnecessary line in the relation and JOSM gave no warning about it (after I've run the validator) |
97398752 | over 4 years ago | Usunąłem zdublowany |