OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
98312518 over 4 years ago

I am trying to fix this right now

98076378 over 4 years ago

A da się tam teraz przejechać samochodem? Bo jedną z tych dróg trzeba usunąć

98076378 over 4 years ago

Hmm, ale teraz ulica Cyraneczki jest podwójnie. Nie powinno tak być

98207891 over 4 years ago

Zgadza się

98146548 over 4 years ago

Kilkanaście budynków ci się skasowało https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=98146548

98124714 over 4 years ago

*L23

98122214 over 4 years ago

*L17, L19

98121756 over 4 years ago

*L12, L13

98040076 over 4 years ago

Ale jeszcze niektórzy używają tą nazwę czy już nie?

97925753 over 4 years ago

This part is currently not under construction

97925753 over 4 years ago

Ale ten odcinek nie jest w budowie. Nawet nie ma jeszcze pozwolenia na budowę

82380035 over 4 years ago

No tak :P Chociaż po tagu ele można rozróżnić

82380035 over 4 years ago

Zresztą tag hill też zakłada, że wzgórze jest naturalne

82380035 over 4 years ago

Ok, zróbmy tak jak zrobiłeś na Kopie Cwila. Dodam tag tourism=viewpoint

82380035 over 4 years ago

Niekoniecznie, peak jest dopuszczalne. na wiki nawet jest natural=peak - the summit of a hill or mountain a hill jest rzadko używane i nie renderuje się na mapie

97152093 over 4 years ago

Building:levels=12 dla jakiegoś kiosku? i to nie jest building=detached tylko building=retail

97220925 over 4 years ago

To nie lepiej usunąć?

97405678 over 4 years ago

I've downloaded all of them, that is why I am surprised. I only got the usual errors about the religious_administration areas (building role in the relation-place of worship). I had to download all of them, because I've been adding the exact shape of these borders. For example - Radiowo now has almost all new borders that were added in my changesets. You can check that here http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=11191068 And that page shows that you've deleted one member of that relation and fixed the continuity. BUT I've checked all the relations and they had no problems with the continuity (I remember checking the Radiowo relation aswell). I downloaded all members and also the whole area where they are. So I don't know how JOSM had not showed me the error message before sending the changeset (also no sign of broken continuity in the edit relation window, everything was fine)

97405678 over 4 years ago

That is weird that there was an unnecessary line in the relation and JOSM gave no warning about it (after I've run the validator)

97398752 over 4 years ago

Usunąłem zdublowany