Quite sure. Sorbus aria is a taxonomically outdated synonym of Aria edulis.

Sorbus is a taxonomic mess that has been considerably revised over the last decade.

https://www.treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/aria/aria-edulis/

"You must not delete the work of other contributors."

Oh dear. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

I did NOT "delete" the work of other contributors. I replaced it with better tagging. To quote the wiki:

"The following closed ways should be treated as linear features:

* "barrier=*, for thicker hedges or walls or detailed mapping defined using an area add area=yes
* "highway=*, see 'Highway areas' below for more details"

Those highway=footway and area=yes tags have highway=footway lines within them.

osm.wiki/Key:area:highway

That tagging which I correctly used is describing the shape of a pavement area. The linear highway=footway ways through the area tagged with area:highway are the ones used for routing.

The combination that you want to use occurs 456,857 times, whereas area:highway is used 349,749 times.

So get off your high horse and actually look at tagging use reality instead.

Easy. That's the correct Latin binomial for it. Sorbus aria is an outdated binomial name for Aria edulis.

https://www.treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/aria/aria-edulis/

Technically yes.

However it's correct, even if a bit redundant. It's certainly better than Quercus n. sp. which means a botanically undescribed species of the quercus genus which is a tad unlikely next to the Peripherique in Paris!!!

Le problème ? Platanus n'est pas une espèce. C'est un genre. Le genre est le niveau supérieur à l'espèce. Il existe de nombreuses espèces chez Platanus. Par exemple, Platanus orientalis et Platanus occidentalis. En français, Platane d’Orient et Platane d’Occident.

Il s'agit d'espèces d'arbres différentes mais toutes deux font partie du genre Platanus.

Pour Plantane il est correct d'utiliser genus:wikipedia:fr.

They mostly are and I intended them to be. Looks like some escaped being sorted out. I will remedy this.

Except that those central pedestrian refuges are large enough to mean that it should be recorded as two carriageways for the distance through the Place des Ternes.

Why do you think I altered it in the first place?

Oh and the give way on node 12532433232 now makes absolutely no sense with the way you left it. You've also managed to get Avenue des Ternes crossing a pedestrian refuge without a corresponding pedestrian crossing node.

I likely would have picked it up with Osmose in any case, but yes it can trivially be resolved. Tilia cordata as a species has Tilia as a genus. That's why Osmose has picked up the problem.

The fault is not my edit. The fault is the current genus tag of Malvales nothing of the sort. Malvales is actually an order rather than a genus. Very much higher up the taxonomic tree.

Simple. No such thing as the combination of Acer and hippocastanum. It was nonsensical information and it was not at all clear what the correct combination should be.

Aesculus hippocastanum as you have added on the other hand is a valid combination and useful information.

D'accord.

Mais l'espece Platanus × hispanica, ou Platanus hispanica est un platane. Vous avez crée cette point avec species=Platanus hispanica.