werner2101 өулланыусының көндәлеге

Transition from OpenStreetBugs to OSM Notes

English телендә werner210116 October 2013 баҫылып сыҡты. Һуңғы яңыртыуҙар 18 October 2013.

yesterday the creation of new bug entries on (http://openstreetbugs.schokokeks.org/) has been disabled.

I’m currently tinkering about how to phase-out OpenStreetBug.

Where are the bugs?
What’s the state of the open bugs?
How to organise the change?

The bugs

The open bugs (45k) are not equaly distributed over the world. Most of the bugs are in germany and netherlands. Here is a map that displays all open bugs. Each of the 512 rectangles contains about 86 bugs.

Distribution of OSB-Bugs

The state of the bugs

I’ve reviewed about 500 bugs in the south of Germany and I guess the bugs can be splitted in following categories:

10% useless descriptions
30% already fixed in the map, but the OSB have not been closed
10% can be fixed with the bug description
20% can be fixed with aerial images (Bing)
30% local knowledge required (can not be fixed)

Organise the change

Disabling adding new bugs to the OSB database: Adding new bugs has been disabled by some applications, but there Apps, that can still add new bugs to the database. We have to talk to all App developers to create OSM Notes instead of OpenStreetBugs. see (osm.wiki/Openstreetbug#Tools_for_Using_and_Exporting_Data)
Communicate to the users to use Notes: I’ve added a deprecation notice to all the OpenStreetbugs wiki pages. OSMBugs.org and the original OSB homepage contain that message now, too.
Invite mappers to fix open bugs in their own area.
Prepare and organize a mapping party to do the final switch to OSM Notes (maybe around 31.12.2013). This may include moving open and usefull OSB bugs to OSM Notes. I will collect some more ideas on this topic how to create worklists, gpx-files of the open bugs, or write a special tool for the party …

BTW: This it my first blog entry.

2013-10-18 update:

created a page in the wiki: osm.wiki/OpenStreetBugs/Phase_Out
provided worklists and stats: http://www.h-renrew.de/h/osm/osmchecks/09_osb_phaseout/

Please help fixing bugs.

Фекер алышыу

Vincent de Philyтарафынан16 October 2013 cәғәт 11:41көндө ҡаралған

I’ll try to close all OSB in my area (Ireland), it’s not too overwhelming. If the bug cannot be armchair-fixed, I’ll just convert it to a note.

It would be great to have a one-click way to “convert” individual OSBs to notes. We didn’t want to bulk-import them, but now that OSB is disabling creation of new bugs, an easy review-one-and-import workflow would make sense.

nfgusedautopartsтарафынан16 October 2013 cәғәт 13:22көндө ҡаралған

working on cleaning up around the Capital District of New York, and have sent a note to talk-us to inspire the US community to help with the clean up.

!i!тарафынан16 October 2013 cәғәт 14:04көндө ҡаралған

Hi, I announced your post at the German OSM forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=370307
Thank you for disabling the feature and maintaining it for the past years! :)

I agree, that we all should start with checking/closing the remaining OSBs, so we might can script an import for the remaining ones that avoids loosing the whole bug history.

An open question might be, what to do with mass added OSBs. For example some people seem to use scripts to add keepright errors and some added requests for example for power network IDs. Maybe we can offer an flag like “automated detection” or offer an interface for external error reporters, so mappers can easily distinguish between user contributed notes and pay more attention to them (as somebody made work to report it to us and we should keep this ones motivated?)

werner2101тарафынан16 October 2013 cәғәт 16:19көндө ҡаралған

@Vincent:

I wouldn’t manually create notes based on osb
I can provide a helper tool to review osb bugs, but it would be cool if as many bugs as possible get fixed or closed before moving them to OSM Notes.

Workflow of the tool:

The programm loads bugs from osb (the area might be one of the rectangles from the picture)
prev/next buttons call the josm remote control (load and zoom to the bug-area)
Fix Bugs in JOSM using OSB Plugin
If local knowledge required move Bug to OSM Notes

I haven’t implemented the last feature yet. The programm looks very ugly. I’ll post a screenshot in a few days.

@nfgusedautoparts:

thanks.

@!i!

I’m not the maintainer of osb (emka is)
from the forum: forwarding bugs added to osb to osn created by apps was an idea of emka, too. But maybe the Apps maintainer can just replace osb with osn.
do you know any pattern of mass added OSB entries?

KristenKтарафынан16 October 2013 cәғәт 18:51көндө ҡаралған

Map roulette?

!i!тарафынан17 October 2013 cәғәт 08:46көндө ҡаралған

@werner

Sorry was just confused about who is who ;)

Well what I know is that user:Bahnpirat added a lot of Bugs with the same hint: http://openstreetbugs.schokokeks.org/?zoom=14&lat=54.21896&lon=12.44037&layers=B0T This is not bad in general, as it helps to get the attention of mappers. On the other hand we need to check if they are really still open and maybe there he is the best that can create an automated check?

!i!тарафынан18 October 2013 cәғәт 08:55көндө ҡаралған

@werner BTW: Do you need help in contacting the apps authors? Is the list at the OSB wikipage complete?

If you like, I can help in getting in touch with the authors as I made a similar call time ago, when it was about blocked applications and nobody had the time to talk to the people.

werner2101тарафынан18 October 2013 cәғәт 16:59көндө ҡаралған

@ !i!

I don’t know if the list of apps is complete. I’ll watch the newly incoming OSB bugs in the database and try to guess which app created it.

Mostly OSMand I, guess.

I’ll contact known Apps maintainer either with mail or feature requests in their ticket systems (github, ….).

I’ve seen some of generated bugs now, too. I’ve started a list on this wiki page: osm.wiki/OpenStreetBugs/Phase_Out

!i!тарафынан20 October 2013 cәғәт 01:12көндө ҡаралған

At my local mailinglist was the question, if we want to migrate the remaining bugs manually (so everybody on his own) or centralized? For keeping better track on quality, I would pers. prever a central migration :)

werner2101тарафынан20 October 2013 cәғәт 07:20көндө ҡаралған

I think we should fix or close as many bugs as we can first. (maybe till end of 2013)

Moving bugs to Notes should be done with references. osm.wiki/OpenStreetBugs/Phase_Out#Mapping_party_.2F_Transition_to_Notes

Using a tool simplifies the transition. Just wait another week. I’ll test my tool in Africa, Alaska, … where only few bugs exists.

To mappers: just fix and close as many OSB bugs as possible.

PS: one of the highest OSB density area is in Germany is Dortmund: http://osmbugs.org/index.html?lat=51.51168&lon=7.46718&zoom=14 lot of dupe and old entries.

kempelenтарафынан 2 November 2013 cәғәт 22:53көндө ҡаралған

Hi! OsmBugs integration to external website was easy, with JS and OpenLayers layer. We had that on www.openstretmap.hu .

This is not possible with Notes, due to different implementation, and would require API coding. Maybe later. But:

for now, can we get a query option that works on www.openstreetmap.org with lat&lon in query string, plus &addnote=1 or whatever, that auto-starts the notes dialog? Please! This is also related to “transition”.

Thank you!

werner2101тарафынан 3 November 2013 cәғәт 10:32көндө ҡаралған

@kempelen

I can’t see that switching from OSB to Notes is hard at all. Little rewriting of the get bugs call (maybe the code from osmbugs.org can help here or the code from www.openstreetmap.org )

… and a few line changes for the other api command (create, comment, close)

Either you have to do some work or www.openstreetmap.org has to.

OpenStreetMap