Is this related to osm.org/user_blocks/15757 ?

Dear user Septana2OOO, please use better changeset descriptions than
"اصلاح..."
and explain why you are changing the highway tag of many roads.

Dear DribareyoConsy, in your edits you claim to have been using "Bing" imagery yet many of the "buildings" you add are just blurry splotches of colour on the Bing imagery, e.g. here: osm.org/way/1255925518 - can you confirm that you are indeed tracing these buildings from Bing and not some other data source, and how did something like the way I quoted above happen?

Seeing that user Barroszt is continuing to map elsewhere without participating here, and therefore apparently has nothing to add, I am now preparing to revert all of Barroszt's changesets that affected the city of Torun in 2024.

Dear user Evlyn, I have reverted your deletion of tracks in this changeset. While land owners can determine where people may go, they cannot dictate what is shown on OpenStreetMap. If you, as a representative of the land owner, have disallowed access on these paths (and signposted this accordingly) then the paths can be marked "access=private" or "access=no" in OpenStreetMap to ensure that everyone knows that these paths, while existing on the ground, may not be used. Deleting a track from OSM that exists on the ground is considered vandalism.

Dear user Tomcrown, when uploading data please use a human-readable changeset description like: "traced buildings in Sango-Otta from Bing" - you can add a hashtag referring to the HOT project if you want, but #hotosm-project-16065;#esc2023;#wnah;#Sango;#Map4Climate is too much & of little use to the humans who read it.

I was not writing this to get a "thank you", I was hoping you'd fix the error. But I've done it for you now so don't worry.

The DWG has become aware of this situation (Ticket#2024022010000431 ). It appears that user Barroszt has turned his attention elsewhere, participating in Map Roulette Challenges in the US. This indicates that the user believes they have sufficiently cleaned up the situation in Torun. Can other mappers confirm that Torun is now "repaired"? If not, I will revert all edits of user Barroszt in the area in the last few months (because you cannot break things in OSM "in preparation for remapping" and then go away and do something else).

Hello zsolt d, please review this situation and provide a reply here. Thank you, Frederik Ramm, OSMF DWG, Ticket #2024022310000256

You have put "www.apple.com" as the web site of your business. This is clearly wrong?

Dear user Dinsh, please slow down your AI building mapping. You are adding data of very low quality to OSM, for example in this changeset see osm.org/way/1253258326 which is totally wrong. Also none of the buildings you have mapped in this changeset conform to any of the imagery sources you have specified. In the future, it is allowed to use AI-derived buildings but at the very least you should visually inspect if they match aerial imagery. Also there have been complaints that you were mapping buildings that were long demolished so please make sure you use accurate data sources. Thank you - Frederik Ramm, OSMF Data Working Group Ticket Ticket#2024022410000147

I have reverted this edit.

Please to not fiddle with the name of the Persian/Arabian gulf without prior discussion in the OSM community.

Dear ACGG, when you want to import third-party data into OSM you need to discuss this with the community first and provide proper source information. This import was not only not discussed, it was also buggy. See: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Ich habe diese Gebäude jetzt wieder gelöscht, da die Quelle fragwürdig ist und der Benutzer sich durch Accountlöschung weiterer Kommunikation entzogen hat. (DWG Ticket#2024021810000168)

Hallo worker12, ich bin nicht sicher, ob die "name"-Tags, die Du verwendest, eine gute Idee sind, sie sind ja sehr deskriptiv - wir schreiben an einen Spielplatz auch nicht name=Spielplatz dran. Ich habe das Thema mal hier im Communityforum angesprochen https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/namensgebung-schutzzonen-tirol/109356 - vielleicht behältst Du die Diskussion dort mal im Auge oder beteiligst Dich auch daran.

Dear user Zemlemer-Geodesist, please specify your source more precisely than just "imagery". The standard aerial imagery layers avaialable to OSM do not seem to support your very detailed drawing of woodland. Also note that natural=wood is to be used for actual forests, not small groups of trees in a public park!

Your quirky changeset comments are misleading; "traced woods in garden square on Raumskaya street" is sufficient.

OSM documents the names that are presently used, not the names that are historically correct. With many other things it is easy, you just look at the signs, sadly water bodies tend not to have signs. DWG is not taking a position on what the "correct" name is for this body of water, we just ask that any change in naming is a result of community consultation and not a result of looking at archives. So the right way to go about changing the name of this water body is opening a discussion on community.openstreetmap.org, presenting your reasoning there and inviting others to comment. Then if a consensus is found, the name can be changed with a pointer to that discussion. Any name change that does not point to a community discussion supporting that change, will be reverted.

The "all of you" was including you though, LockOnGuy ;)

The DWG has received complaints about this changesets saying that someone's privacy was violated and/or there have been death threats. I think these claims are a wild over-reaction; as far as I can see, the places mentioned here have several hundred thousand inhabitants so "mapper X lives in city Y" is not really telling anyone anything new. Please don't waste DWG's time by organising smear campaigns against individuals. If you cannot work together for the best of OSM, then all of you should leave OSM and make room for people who can.