Please try not to edit the same object 6 times when instead you could just edit it once. This creates 5 unnecessary copies of the object in our database (and in changeset streams). Also, please specify adequate sources for the official_name:* tags you are adding. If this is an automated process, it needs to follow these rules: osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Dear Jubaerorun, I am unsure about htese changesets you are adding. Every single one of your changesets has a comment of "please update information" - what does that mean? Whom are you addressing here, whom do you want to "update" the information you are adding? Also, if you don't mind me saying, the building outlines you are adding are of a much lower quality than could be achieved from Bing aerial imagery; not one of your houses is rectangular even though they look fairly rectangular on the imagery. Perhaps you need to zoom it a little further, and work slower?

Darth_Vader, what you are threatening here is computer vandalism and it is illegal in South Carolina. Participating in such activity can severely affect your school/college experience or career. Think twice before you do anything you regret later - it's not worth it.

You also added osm.org/way/547470728 and osm.org/way/547470610 in this changeset, and one lies inside the other. There seem to be more cases like this. Is there an explanation for this that is not "badly executed import"?

Is this an import? You added this "farmland"
osm.org/way/547471799 which lies wholly inside this other "farmland" osm.org/way/547471807 that you created 2 weeks ago. Did you not notice?

Is this an import or a manual tracing?

This import consist of over 100k edits altogether. Has it been discussed either in the Finnish community or internationally before it was performed? Please point me to that discussion.

Changes have been reverted in osm.org/changeset/54647052 - please discuss imports/automated edits with the community beforehand to avoid issues with data quality and licensing.

It might actually be - MTB cyclists seem to have a strange sense of humour see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2017-October/008145.html

g246020 - the answer is "it depends". In this particular case, "Zowie Polie" has shown to be learning resistant to a degree where we cannot continue to assume good intentions, hence I believe reviewing their edits will be a waste of time. But that is a judgement call and not a standard procedure.

Hallo Garmano, in diesem Changeset, das Du mit "Added Westpark" tituliert hast, wurde auch die Stadt Hong Kong von einer Stadt zu einem Miet-Lagerplatz (shop=storage_rental) herabklassifiziert. Kannst Du Dir erklären, wie das passiert ist? Kannst Du es reparieren, oder benötigst Du dabei Hilfe?

Hello FreedSky, please start using changeset comments to describe what you are editing - at least in cases where it is likely that more people will be interested, for example like this changeset where you edited the border between China and India. What is your source for this edit? Why was this edit made? Things like that belong in the changeset comment so that others watching the area can see what is happening, *especially* when you edit anything like borders or names. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more explanation.

Correction, accidentally copied over previous changeset comment - this one was just advertising in a description tag.

Ist das hier wirklich ein "Marktplatz" (wo man hingehen und einkaufen kann), oder doch nur das Büro eines Dienstleisters? Der Eintrag kommt mir ein bisschen sehr "werblich" vor.

Ich revertiere jetzt die mechanischen Edits der vergangenen Wochen. Geozeisig, jeder andere würde bei derart dickköpfigen Regelverstößen - ist ja bei Dir nicht das erste Mal, siehe osm.org/changeset/28861610 vom Februar 2015 - eine längere Sperre kassieren. Du machst viele gute und sorgfältige Edits - Du musst doch einsehen, dass solcherlei "Rasenmäher-Edits" aus der Ferne die Karte nur verschlechtern. Bitte unterlasse das in Zukunft.

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass im Dateinamen was vom "3. Weltkrieg" steht. Zum Glück ist es derzeit noch offensichtlich, dass es ein Fehler ist ;) da das File aber auf Wikimedia Commons liegt und auch bei openplaques verlinkt ist, habe ich mich nicht getraut, was zu ändern.

You say that the buildings were drawn from photos. Looking at the current Bing imagery, the building outlines do not match the imagery, for example osm.org/edit?editor=id&way=156818899#map=19/47.26188/39.69043 - the shape of the building is different. What imagery did you use to trace the buildings from?

Hello luiswoo, it appears to me that this, and a couple similar changesets, may have been an undiscussed data import that happened five years ago. Do you remember what you did here? The houses carry a source tag of "rosreestr" - what data source is that, and what license is it published under?

Why did you add "category=Земли поселений (земли населенных пунктов)" to every single house?

Hello DenisJu, in this changeset you are modifying a lot of roads that were part of an buggy import from 2010 (changeset 4557844 et al.). I'm unsure what the legal situation of the data source is; there's a wiki page osm.wiki/AlbanianFloodingCrisisCamp that seems to be connected. Do you know anything about this? The roads have a ton of uncommon tags (CATEGORY, Cat2, ET_ID, ID, Shape_Le_1, Shape_Leng, TYPE). Is this data valuable to the Albanian community today? Is any help required in cleaning up buggy remains of the import?

I don't think it needs more correction and wouldn't normally have bothered waking up a 1-year inactive user for it but here you go: osm.org/changeset/41625699