This school building/site does not really match aerial imagery. Can you double-check?

Dear rost_huad555, could you read osm.wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut and then revisit the tagging of this object?

I have reverted these edits now. It is not clear what the intention was but clearly the execution was problematic. An edit of this magnitude should potentially also be discussed with the community in advance; I am doubtful that the community would agree to the blanket merging of POIs with their containing buildings.

This house already had a driveway mapped. Now it has two. Why?

Please don't - type=boundary is totally legit for large non-administrative features. I'm changing that back.

Hello bzsurf03, please do not copy information from Google Maps - even if it is just something small like an address or a "south" prefix on a street name. Google's stuff is copyrighted and we are not allowed to use it. I have reverted your edit. (DWG Ticket#2020090210000736)

Sagen wir mal so: 200m entfernt von der Insel ist eine Gaststätte namens "Zum Storchennest". Wenn ich da reingehen würde und fragen "Entschuldigung, wo ist denn die Rehot Insel", würden die dann sagen "gleich hier vorn" oder würden die sagen "äh was für 'ne Insel"?

Can you specifiy the source for this detailed knowledge of the university? Are you a local with first-hand knowledge or have you taken this from some web site or campus plan?

Hallo JonahF2014,

es geht um den Namen "Rehot Insel", den Du bereits vor einem Jahr verwendet hast, der aber dann von anderen angezweifelt wurde. Angeblich kommt der Name aus einem Spiel? Siehe die Disksussion hier: osm.org/changeset/69191161

Der Name wurde dann gelöscht, aber vor zwei Monaten in diesem Changeset von Dir erneut eingetragen, Quelle angeblich "local knowledge". Kannst Du dieses "Local knowledge" etwas genauer ausführen und den Vorwurf entkräften, es handele sich um einen erdachten Namen aus einem Spiel?

Danke
Frederik Ramm, OSMF Data Working Group
Ticket #2020090110000292

Dear osm_saint-louis, a changeset in which you delete 100 buildings needs a better description than the name of the city this happens in. Please explain to your fellow mappers why you saw the need to delete existing buildings. I am not saying you cannot do it - just that if you do it, it deserves an explanation.

Dear user Peterborough GIS, it appears that you have performed a major data import here. Were you aware of the existing rules that govern data imports in OpenStreetMap (osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines) which mandate, among other things, proper documentation of your plans and a discussion with the community before the import is executed? If yes, could you point me to a public record of this discussion? I am worried about the fact that no source is specifed, and I notice that you have deleted many buildings that existed in the region before. I would like to know what process you applied to decide which buildings to delete, and how to ensure that you were not accidentally deleting something worth keeping. I am a member of OSM's Data Working group tasked with enforcing our data import rules.

Hallo, seit ich nach der Quelle für Deine Ergänzugen gefragt habe, hast Du die Ergänzungen wieder gelöscht und Deinen Account umbenannt, aber die Frage steht nach wie vor im Raum, woher kamen die Informationen, und falls sie aus einer nicht zulässigen Quelle kamen: Welche anderen Daten hast Du aus der gleichen nicht zulässigen Quelle übernommen und können wir uns darauf verlassen, dass das in Zukunft nicht mehr vorkommt?

Hallo, kennst Du Dich in dieser Gegend aus? Angeblich (lt. einer Mail an webmaster@openstreetmap.de) ist das Grundstück verkauft und sowohl der Biwakplatz als auch der Kanuverleih sind geschlossen?

Oops, sorry, I should perhaps have written this in English? Anyway, please don't map railways of which nothing remains - those can go into OpenHistoricalMap.

Hallo Max, ich verstehe Dein Interesse an früherer Bahn-Infrastruktur, aber Gleise, von denen nichts mehr übrig ist, mappen wir nicht in OpenStreetMap. (Die waren vor Jahren schon mal drin und sind dann gelöscht worden...) Der richtige Ort für solche Information aus der Vergangenheit wäre die "OpenHistoricalMap".

Hall b*k*, der FOSSGIS hat eine Email von dem buddhistischen "Europe Center" erhalten, dass dieser Weg osm.org/way/106634281 eine Privatstraße sei. Hast Du da Ortskenntnis, kannst Du das bestätigen?

Has he also explained why this source is legal to use, and committed to properly attributing the source in the future?

Hello joserrg12, if this data comes from the AIG as mariotomo claims, then please cite this as a source, and point to their permission to use the data in OSM. If this data does not come from the AIG, then please say where it comes from, and again, cite the source correctly and demonstrate that we have permission to use it.

Hello wellasus, do you have an explanation for this changeset claiming that you have used the 7 different imagery layers "Maxar-Premium", "Bing Streetside", "Mapillary Images", "Mapillary Map Features", "Mapillary Signs", "OpenStreetCam Images", and "Bing" - and all that to add one driveway and modify two other highways? Did you really cycle through all these imagery sources to make these contributions? It is helpful for other mappers to know which imagery was used for a certain object, but a list like that is more confusing than helpful.

jlcc78, please supply a photograph (or link to Mapillary photo) that confirms the street is actually signposted "Calle La Coruña". If you cannot do that, I suggest that this changeset be reverted.