This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits

Yes, it appears that the "reconstruct polygon" function has a bug when it comes to copying tags. I'll investigate and fix this before I continue, but I definitely intend to "degrade" many more multipolygons created by SHARCRASH - essentially all those where several otherwise unrelated objects have been plunged into a multipolygon just because they're all wood or so.

If I may add 2 points: (a) Just because there is rubbish in OSM, that's not an excuse to add more! (b) Wikidata is more often than not derived from Wikipedia which is licensed CC-BY-SA; I know that Wikidata claims to be CC0 but I highly doubt the legality of this.

In this changeset titled "substation refinement", you have added denomination and religion information to many cemeteries. It would be good if you could - for this changeset and in the future - provide information about your sources. Did you run a web search? Consult Wikipedia? Do you live nearby?

Also, you added considerable detail to substations, for example you added voltage, frequency, operator, and reference number to osm.org/way/369283636 - again, it seems hardly believable that you have sourced this information from Bing as the changeset source tag claims. Please specify!

Hallo Peer van Daalen, dieser Changeset-Kommentar war sehr unhöflich und ist geeignet, Deine ausgezeichneten Edits in Aachen und anderswo mit einem bitteren Beigeschmack zu verderben. Ich hoffe, Du bringst, wenn Du darüber geschlafen hast, die Größe auf, Dich zu entschuldigen.

This changeset looks very similar to a number of semi-automatic changesets by contributors working for Facebook that have been reverted because of low quality and a process violation (imports must be discussed before they are performed). Can you explain the process by which you extracted these ~ 8500 ways from DigitalGlobe, and why every way has only two nodes?

Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!

Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!

Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!

Kannst Du das konkretisieren - auf einen Zeitraum oder eine Liste von Changesets? Ich könnte zwar "alle Flächen, die in den X Wochen vor dem Import gelöscht wurden" wiederherstellen, fürchte aber, das wäre dann vielleicht zu viel und würde Duplikate verursachen?