Hola kokoadict, in this changeset you have deleted something like 100 buildings. Checking aerial imagery it looks like the buildings are still there. Why did you delete them - have these buildings been destroyed?

Hello Lucia_Mazza, and welcome to OSM. You are contributing a lot of buildings and you are saving every single one of them. This is not necessary; you can accumulate a few dozen before hitting the save button. Also, most buildings are square and not trapezoid - use the "Q" key in the editor to make your building rectangular!

Hello Jinx Naleo, and welcome to OSM. You are using a lot of what we call "descriptive names". The "name" tag should be reserved for the name of things and not a description. For example, you have added a school in osm.org/way/1223840693 but you have not mapped it as a school - instead you have drawn an unspecified building and gave it the name "Gov. Public School K.Khel". It is better to choose the correct tag for a school (amenity=school) and then drop the description from the name. (Also, avoid abbreviations in the name.)

Dear Bikon8, welcome to OSM! You are using what we call "descriptive names". The "name" tag on an object is there to record the name of a building, not the purpose. For example, there is a specific tag for a library that you should use when mapping a library, rather giving the building a "name" of "Library". Also "Academic" is not a proper name for a building, and "School Path" an unlikely name for a footpath!

Dear AlexVDP, welcome to OSM! You have made many tiny uploads of one house each. You don't need to hit the "save" button after every house - it is easier to accumulate a few edits and then save them together!

Dear charlottejohnson, welcome to OSM. In this changset you have deleted more than 50 buildings without specifying any reason for it (the comment you provided on upload was "#hotosm-project-13149 #KLL #MapGive #mappingtheunmapped #mapforcause #osmnepal" which sadly does not help anyone understand why buildings need to be deleted). As a general rule, if you want to re-draw an existing object, we prefer it if you can simply move the existing object into place rather than deleting and re-doing it. Of course if the buildings you have deleted have actually ceased to exist then it would be good to mention that on the changeset comment ("deleting buildings that have been destroyed" or something like that).

Hallo KuprianP, bitte gib im Changeset-Kommentar beim Hochladen einen Text ein, der kurz Deine Änderung beschreibt. "local" ist keine gute Beschreibung.

Hi there and welcome to OSM. You may want to check the address you entered for "Tipsy's", you are currently stating the street is "Dundee-Huntley Rd" but no such street exists nearby?

Hello there and welcome to OSM. Are there two stationery stores right next to each other, or is this one store that you accidentally added twice? Maybe one of them needs to be deleted again? -- When setting the name, never use a descriptive tag. A stationery store will not usually be called "Stationery Store", it will be called something like "Anna's Paper Things" or maybe "Office 3000" or something like that. Unless of course "Stationery Store" is what it says on the sign outside.

When I asked you to add sources I didn't mean with every object, I meant a source tag on the changeset. Also, if you intend to use the Rapid editor to import AI-detected tracks across all of Turkey, please discuss this matter with the Turkish community first and link to that discussion in the changeset; AI-detected geometries are not equally welcome everywhere.

Dear btns, after the recent revert of an undiscussed import of yours, you have already contributed hundreds of changesets with addresses, track roads, and now boundaries, all without specifying a source. Initially I thought it might be local knowledge but it is now becoming clear that your contributions must have other sources because nobody can personally survey that much in so little time. In the future please specify the data source with each of your edits so that we know where the data comes from (and whether the use of that data source is permitted with OSM).

DWG Ticket#2023111410000025 I forgot to add.

Hello Chuckles 2, you have added a bicycle=no to osm.org/way/828669794 a year ago. Now the "Scripps Ranch Villages Master Association" writes that in fact this path was off-limits to non-residentials even when on foot, so we'd have to make it access=private. Any comments on this - do you remember what the signage was when you were there?

Hallo, hast Du in Deinen Unterlagen (oder der Erinnerung) vielleicht noch Details zu diesem Weg, den Du eingetragen hast: osm.org/way/1008174425/history -- auf dem Luftbild kann man nur Teile des Wegs erkennen, andere scheinen quer über eine Wiese zu gehen und wir haben eine Beschwerde des Grundstücksbesitzers von dort, wo der Weg im Norden in die Straße einmündet - da sei kein Weg, sondern sein privater Garten... (DWG Ticket#2023111410000098)

In this changeset you deleted a large number of buildings without an explanation. If these buildings have been demolished then it would have been good to mention that in the changeset comment (e.g. "removing demolished buildings"), otherwise people might think that it was a mistake or even deliberate vandalism.

Wann war das denn, das Vorbeiwandern? Nur weil sich bei der DWG einer gemeldet hat, der da wohnt und der sagt, da wäre keine Känguruzucht. -- Wie kamst Du auf "Zucht", steht das auf einem Schild? Vielleicht waren das ja nur jemandes Haustiere...?

Dear JohnG, please don't delete paths that exist in reality just because access is prohibited; instead, tag them as access=private or access=no. The path you have deleted in this changeset will simply be added back in again by someone else looking at aerial imagery - and who won't know that it is no access! Had you left the path in OSM with access=no, that would not happen. Also, even if access is prohibited here, knowledge about this path could very well save lives in an emergency - a possibility that your deletion has now cut off.

Dear Issy Badman, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset you have drawn a number of very large buildings that, on closer inspections, are really plot boundaries - the buildings that sit inside these boundaries are much smaller. This is incorrect and needs to be fixed.

Also may I suggest that you use a changeset comment that describes what you did - to the un-initiated, "#gsdsociety2324" is meaningless and some OSM community mappers view it as disrespectful if others don't at least spend two human-readable words to describe what they did (e.g. "traced buildings").

Erstmal abwarten. Ich denke, ich werde noch ein bisschen mehr löschen müssen.

Hallo, danke für die Erfassung der Hydranten! Normalerweise benutzen wir das Tag "name" nur dann, wenn etwas einen Eigennamen hat (wenn z.B. ein berühmter Hydrant den Namen Fritz-Müller-Hydrant hätte oder so etwas). Für die hier erfassten Hydranten und Brunnen würde man eigentlich keine Namen setzen - stattdessen würde man das "ref"-Tag nutzen, um die Nummer zu erfassen. Siehe auch: osm.wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant