Hello Badojo, can you explain your source for changing many "level_crossing" to "tram_level_crossing" here?

Dear user Kenjie Calcita, thank you for your contributions to OSM! You don't need to save each building separately; you can add a few of them and then save together. And then please add a good changeset comment like "added buildings in Jipapad" or so - "." is not a good comment.

Hello CurlingMan13, I have attempted to add the proper access tags to the trails in question, though a survey is probably required to confirm.

Kannst Du bitte auch die korrekte Quelle angeben, "knowledge" ist für eine Geometrie-Änderung wie osm.org/way/174942653 oder osm.org/way/178035075 ja wohl eher nicht angebracht.

It seems unlikely that you have personally surveyed this border. Please state your source for this modification.

Dear Uditi Bisaria, please refrain from using "Hashtag-only" changeset comments. Hashtags have their own field where they can go in the iD editor; for the changeset comment, please use a human-readable explanation of your edits. (In more recent edits you have put "Congo river floods response" but we're really more interested in an explanation of what you have edited, than in the motivation for editing!)

Dear Karoll Ustate, please do not name buildings, roads or other areas "Manzana, Karoll Ustate". This is not the name of the place and should not be on the map.

Dear user Isocarras, please do not attach a name of "casa" to buildings you map. The name tag is only there for buildings with a special name like "Word Trade Center" or so.

Dear Valeri_2408, place=plot is not the correct tag for a building. building=yes is sufficient. Do not use "edificio" as a building name - the name is only there if a building has a special name like "World Trade Center" or something like that.

Dear Luis Manjarrez, please do not create "city blocks" that have the size of a single building. Please do not call these blocks "Valep", that is not the correct name.

A path in OSM is not first and foremost a "walking path" - it is just a path that exist, and who is allowed to do what on that path is something we have other tags for. Same for private driveways. We have a right to record this information, and interfering with our right is vandalism.

We are very interested in depicting the reality on the ground, and we do not want to mislead people into believing they could walk somewhere where they can't. I know for a fact that AllTrails will respect the access=private in routing, i.e. it won't suggest you walk there; as for their cartographic representation, I don't know how they process access=private but if they really don't do that then it is a mistake on their part! For what it's worth, AllTrails themselves recommend using access=private: https://support.alltrails.com/hc/en-us/articles/360058130612-What-if-a-trail-is-on-my-private-property

Dear rj_ruin, I have reverted your deletions and instead marked paths as private where this was not already the case. Correct information about existing infrastructure must not be removed form OSM; OSM is not responsible for "too many people taking the path", and removing such information from OSM is vandalism. Please convey that to the land owner on whose behalf you performed these deletions. (DWG Ticket#2024092410000081)

Are you sure this area of the city is called "manzana maria isabel"? Is it a conincidence that it matches your user name?

Dear MiguelMindiolac, please don't create residential areas with a name of "NOMBRE". Please also make a resdiential area at least encompass the whole building block - don't make mini residential areas for every building!

Hello there EvansGitonga, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. There is a hot-key in the editor, "Q", that will help you square a building. The imagery you are using is not precise enough to detect the real building shapes anyway so squaring the walls is probably a good approximation ;)

Also, try and group some edits before uploading; you don't have to upload every single building on its own.

See osm.org/changeset/156298467 in which this edit seems to have been reverted for unclear reasons.

In this changeset you have renamed Portugal Parkway to India Street, which seems wrong to me; see osm.org/changeset/137457295 and https://www.heraldnews.com/story/news/local/ojornal/2023/06/14/providence-india-street-renamed-to-portugal-parkway-to-honor-portuguese-heritage-contributions-r-i/70323974007/ - can you explain why you renamed the street? Your changeset comment is not quite clear about that.

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 156745349, 156745974, 156746712, 156786089, 156786248, 156786400, 156786470.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156865347 where the changeset comment is: Revert der Edits von Benutzer 'Daniel Schlüter', da Zweifel an der Richtigkeit bestehen, siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/neuer-user-mit-allerhand-loschungen/118958

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156865347 where the changeset comment is: Revert der Edits von Benutzer 'Daniel Schlüter', da Zweifel an der Richtigkeit bestehen, siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/neuer-user-mit-allerhand-loschungen/118958