Ich muss mich selbst korrigieren. Auf osm.wiki/DE:Permissions/Marktstammdatenregister ist inzwischen eine Nutzungserlaubnis für das Marktstammdatenregister dokumentiert - allerdings erfordert diese, dass das Marktstammdatenregister als Quelle angegeben wird, was Du hier und in Deinen vergangenen Edits ja nicht getan hast. Im Gegenteil, Du hast hier ausdrücklich eine falsche Quelle ("aerial imagery") angegeben...

Dear BREYSSE JM, please use good changeset comments instead of "Mise à jour" which applies to practically every edit. See: osm.wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

Are you sure about the capitalisation of "Impasse Adeline VENTURI" and so on? Are there capital letters on the street signs?

Hallo Huldega, bitte nutze doch die Upload-Kommentar-Funktion auch dann, wenn Dein Edit Dir selber belanglos erscheint - für einen Laien ist zum Beispiel bei diesem Edit hier, der 32 Ways umfasst, nicht sofort klar, was Du eigentlich gemacht hast, und man muss sich erst mühevoll in die History der einzelnen Objekte klicken, um das erahnen zu können...

Hallo windkraft-os, in diesem Changeset hast Du eine Windkraftanlage eingetragen und als Quelle "aerial imagery" angegeben. Auf dem Luftbild ist sie jedoch für mich zumindest nicht zu sehen. Ferner hast Du der Anlage Daten hinzugefügt, die, selbst wenn das Windrad auf dem Luftbild sichbar wäre, vom Luftbild nicht entnehmbar sind (Betreiber, Leistung, Höhe usw.)

Wo kommen diese Daten her?

Du bist 2022 bereits auf die Unzulässigkeit der Verwendung des "Marktstammdatenregisters" für OSM hingewiesen worden und hast Dich damals uneinsichtig gezeigt. Sollte sich herausstellen, dass Du immer noch vom Marktstammdatenregister abschreibst, müssen Deine Beiträge der letzten Jahre komplett entfernt werden.

Dear Estherluanda, please use the "comment" field only for human-readable text when uploading ("mapped buildings in Goma" is fine). Hashtags belong in the "hashtags" field, and image source information belongs in the "source" field.

The changeset description "CtlA2-Lud{2024}|przeb" does not sufficiently substantiate this deletion. Please add a human-readable comment that tells us why you made this edit and based on what information.

The explanation "stream not present" is clearly misleading for this changeset, in which an attempt was made to delete several features that are clearly visible from aerial imagery, for example this building osm.org/way/733569388 or the trails underneath the HydroOne power line. If the building(s) have been demolished, the changeset comment should say so. I am reverting these edits now for being unsubstantiated.

Dear PaczaD, in this changeset you have added a single residential road in Colombia. Your description of this edit was "#hotosm-project-17762 #amazonia #niño #forest #fire #Mapeo_Amazonia" which tells the human reader nothing. Please put hashtags in the hashtag field, and use a human readable comment for the comment field. Thank you!

Dear UWERA Rosy, thank you for your contributions to OSM. It would be great if you could separate out the hashtags and image source into the fields where they belong. Your changeset comment should be simply "Mapped buildings in Goma in DRC"; any hashtags you want to add go in the "hashtags" input field, and if you want to specify an image source that goes into the "source" field. Thank you for aiming the changeset description at actual humans ;)

Appears that two machine-generated accounts cleaned up after one another.

(Einige Changeset-Kommentare wurden von der DWG versteckt, weil private Telefonnummern enthalten waren, Ticket#2024121710000276)

Dear Max Lessard, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Out of respect to other mappers, it is customary to full the "comment" field with a human-readable description of the mapping in question, e.g. "mapped buildings in XY city" or so. Hashtags (which are aimed not at humans reading the description but at machines evaluating them) belong in the "hashtags" field, not in the comment. Thank you.

In this changeset you have deleted several dozen buildings which still seem to exist according to aerial imagery. Please explain.

I am reverting this. @Spring Valley Farm, the next time you feel the need to delete paths form OSM, please discuss on the forum before you go ahead. See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/landowner-deleting-footpaths-with-no-changeset-comment/122833

Hallo Bai yuchen, bitte fülle den Changeset-Kommentar aus, wenn Du Daten zu OSM hochlädst, so dass andere Mapper sich einen Eindruck davon machen können, was Deine Absicht war. Danke!

Hello Дарья134, please don't use "дом" as the name of buildings you add; it is not a name but a description. If you want to highlight that people live there, use building=house - no need to set a name.

Also, you can draw many buildings in a session and upload them altogether, you don't have to upload every single building.

Please use the "Q" key to make your buildings rectangular.

Hello readthemap, I see that you have mainly deleted objects that carried the tag "way:building=yes" in this changeset. While this is acceptable, it would be good if you could point that out in the changeset comment ("deleted non-existent buildings") instead of just writing "edit" which helps nobody understand your action.

Hello YGTvyihunjdsoh, thank you for your contributions to OSM. I have two recommendations: (1) you can use the "Q" key in the ID editor to make a building square. Your buildings look a little out of shape ;) and (2), don't upload every single edit. You can make 20 buildings and then upload them all together.

Personally I would not dare to remove a highway=footway under dense tree cover just because I cannot see it on aerial imagery (osm.org/way/20497218). Also, in their missives to DWG/OSMF the land owner has not claimed that these paths do not exist - just that they were on private property. But if you have used the same reasoning here as in other parts of Virgina and it has worked well then I'll trust your judgement.