Deletions look legit; spot check shows no traces of abandoned rail visible on aerial imagery

Dear km2pb, I have reverted your edits in which you re-added links to 3rd party Youtube URLs. Whether or not these "make the map more interesting" is not the question here; they don't belong in OSM. I have not sufficiently made this clear in my message to Hubert above, but I am saying this in my capacity as a member of OSM's Data Working Group and I sincerely ask you to stop adding links back in that I have removed (or in fact add any links to 3rd party platforms apart from the well-established Wikipedia links).

Ich habe diese Löschung jetzt zunächst einmal rückgangig gemacht, weil ich annehme, dass Chris921 als gerade erst angemeldeter Benutzer den Unterschied zwischen "ist in OpenStreetMap" und "ist auf einer Wanderkarte" nicht kennt. Community-Post dazu hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/loschung-von-t6-wegen-im-karwendel-tirol/130321 - das ist keine endgültige Entscheidung, es kann durchaus sein, dass wir die Wege am Ende tatsächlich löschen, es sollte nur nicht einer allein entscheiden und schon gar nicht jemand, dessen allererster Beitrag zu OSM das ist.

Die hier gelöschten Wege waren in OSM ausnahmslos mit "sac_scale=difficult_alpine_hiking" (also T6) gekennzeichnet. Ist Deine Behauptung, dass dies unzutreffend ist, weil die gelöschten Wege sämtlich schwieriger als T6 sind?

Hi there Frankarkohpaintsil, the "changeset comment" is intended to be an explanation of your mapping so that others can see what you have been doing. "Uccyouthmappers16" is not a good changeset comment because it doesn't say anything about your mapping. Better put something like "added buildings" or whatever it is you did! Also, you can combine several edits in one upload, you don't need to upload for every single house.

Hello ^_^, it would be good if you could fill out the "changeset comment" field so that other mappers know what you are doing!

Dear EGYYYY2, in this changeset you performed a very welcome cleanup of spam. If you do that, please put something in the changeset comment ("removing spam nodes" or so) - don't just write "." and let others guess what this was about!

Hello Blue Clip, a decision on whether or not to revert your changes is going to be based on license compatibility, not on your consent or your withdrawing thereof. If English is not your native language, feel free to explain yourself in a language you feel more comfortable with.

I made osm.org/user_blocks/17684 to ensure the user sees this message.

Dear Margitravn, the "changeset comment" field is intended to let other members of the OpenStreetMap project understand what your intent was when uploading. "#ewbswe" is unintelligible to other users; please be so kind as to enter a changeset comment that lets other people understand your mapping.

Also, I noticed that you are using the RapID editor with the "poweruser" flag set. This is not recommended for mappers who have only just signed up; this setting will switch off certain editor features that would keep you from making mistakes and damaging the map.

Please do not change or delete any of the names of the Persian/Arabian Gulf without prior discussion. This edit has been reverted.

After deletions were repeated in osm.org/changeset/166147300 I blocked the account at osm.org/user_blocks/17678

Dear максонДудолад, please use the "changeset comment" field to write a human-readable description (in Ukrainian or English) of your edit, e.g. "added farmland". Your recent descriptions of "bdfbbbf", "egrdgddbf", "rthererge", or "rgnfvbngfn" are not useful. See osm.wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD for details.

The driveway connecting 111th and 107th has been removed again by the owner, and a complaint lodged with DWG as Ticket #2025050710000421. I reverted the deletion and explained to them that access=private is sufficient to deter trespassers.

Hi, the wiki import page still talks of this import as being "at the planning stage". It would be good if that could be updated.

Dear Blue_on_the_time, the "changeset comment" field is where you explain to your fellow mappers what your edit is about. "a" is not a good description for a changeset with > 900 edits. A few more words would be good! See osm.wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD for details.

There was a large land-use polygon that covered sectors 8 and 9 before. You have deleted that and instead created a land-use polygon for sector 9 only. Hence sector 8 is now without.

After your edit, this area osm.org/changeset/165661865#map=19/19.276776/72.864776 is now without landuse=residential (the map background is white not gray). Is that intentional? It was residential before.

La page que j'ai mentionnée répertorie de nombreuses raisons pour lesquelles un chemin privé devrait figurer sur la carte.

Dear LouisSchaechterle, in OpenStreetMap we add the marker "access=private" to private paths, instead of deleting them. I have reverted your edits. See osm.wiki/FR:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for an explanation of the issue. (DWG Ticket#2025043010000488)