DUGA, in your profile you explain what you define as "cosmetic changes". Please explain how your deletion of abandoned railways in this changeset fits your own definition of "cosmetic changes".

Dear Mykhailo, please explain why you reverted this changeset. Please also make it a habit to explain the revert reason directly in your changeset comment in the future, rather than just writing "revert".

Hello Jan, in this changeset you have made changes to an underground road without specifying your source of information. In a private message to another contributor you have claimed to use Google Maps as a source. Please never use Google Maps to contribute data to OSM, as everything you base on Google Maps will have to be reverted. Instead, when making edits to features that are not visible on aerial imagery, always specify which (legal) source the edit is based on.

Not only did you uselessly edit tens of thousands of objects - it appears that the "fix" you performed was changing "NAME" into "name", while leaving a dozen similarly useless tags untouched!

Dear Nordpfeil, this mass "correction" of "syntax errors" violated our automated editing guidelines. The next time you stumble over a five-digit number of nodes that are buggy, please do not blindly "fix" them but seek discussion first. In this particular case, it turns out that the nodes stem from a bad import and need to be removed anyway. Your "fixing" only makes the removal harder.

Dear giorgio92, please explain the source of this data or it will have to be removed as an undiscussed import like the others.

Is there a particular reason why you singled out the building Driekastanjelaarsstraat 50 to draw a garden there, but have not done so in any of the neighbouring properties? Is there something special about the garden in No. 50?

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.