Thank you! I realised this about he tag after doing some more reading on coastline tagging and debugging osm.wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Coastline after the topic of the flooded tiles in this area came up on Twitter. It is too long since I have been an active mapper... cheers!

Why did you remove the coastline tag from this relation?

In this changeset several stretches of abandoned railway have been re-tagged as rail - have they been re-opened?

osm.org/way/412114683 does not look like a park; it looks like private housing and gardens.

osm.org/way/180138033 does not look like a park; it looks like a traffic island which has been tagged for the renderer.

In this changeset you have deleted a couple of sections of residential street. osm.org/way/412427441 and osm.org/way/180183982 - why?

Cheers nikospag. You might have noticed now that I revoked JayCBR's block early this morning, at his contrite request. And I know the edit patterns of Γιαννης 4 are a serious ongoing problem and I would like to take harsher action, but 96 hours is the longest block available through the regular interface, without a special request to the sysadmins.

I plan to set out the problem with Γιαννης 4 to the rest of the DWG and ask for a longer term block on that account.

nikospag phew! I am glad i have not incurred your wrath.

The longer block was applied after consultation with DWG because we hope for and expect better from a serious mapper like JayCBR. I didn't take a screenshot but the edit was definitely a short, isolated area in the shape of an enormous cock and balls.

This dispute originates in the continued problematic edits of Γιάννης 4 who has been a serious persistent problem for DWG with a series of dubious edits and a long history of non-contact with the community, BUT it does not serve to retaliate against potential vandalism with more vandalism. I know I should have dealt with Γιάννης 4's edits sooner, I wasn't available over the weekend and things deteriorated. :/

I do carry a big stick yes but I try not to wield it most of the time.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38849997 where the changeset comment is: