Sorry, just realized a different user may have tagged this.

Hi, do you have a source for tagging power lines as "24940" volts? I know this is technically 2 * 12470 V, but typically these are just referred to as 25kV, since I believe the voltages are actually irrational numbers anyway. Cheers.

Hi, what is your source for lines with a voltage of 72kV ? Specifically, way# 269125294 seems to be connected to other 138 kV busbars at the Moose Jaw substation. Can you confirm this voltage? I only have only seen a SaskPower map with voltages down to 110 kV.

Hi, thanks for mapping power lines. I noticed you untagged a ref from a powerline, and moved it to your new parallel line, which is great. However, you forgot to also untag the voltage and cables. I'll fix it here. To visualize power data, visit openinframap.org

Hi, I just discovered this large area named "andrew1", I see it hasn't been resolved. I will delete it in a couple days unless andrewboyd wants more time to export the data for private use.

I agree, the operator I tagged on the Natural Gas boiler may actually be a contractor. But why did you remove some power=plant tags? I will re-add if this was an accident.

Thanks for the tip. I'm familiar with that map, I actually have been looking at the 2018 version. I wasn't sure what map was newer, BC Hydro or OSM since it seemed someone was doing some tagging I didn't know the source of. Now, it's obvious 1L17 is old, and they've upgraded the lines to higher voltage. Cheers

Whoops thanks!

I agree, I removed the tags to see how it looks. I was worried the area may render over the roadways in some renderers.

Hi, are you certain about the location of the proposed subway where it crosses under Great Northern Way upto Broadway? This vancouver city PDF from 2014 shows the subway going under the Canvas residential area at a much different angle: http://council.vancouver.ca/20140204/documents/p1.pdf

Sorry, but the Esri imagery best matches what is on the ground here. I reverted this change because I am was just here and am certain the parking lot is not a circle.

Thanks for noticing that. Should be fixed now.

Thanks for adding the name to this. What is your source for this?

Please don't delete stop nodes- bus stops do not get demolished.

The map I found showing this area is in "Schedule B - Ladner" page B3-25. I believe the map is misleading, since it is only showing future plans for general areas, not at the lot level. Additionally, half of the houses built in this newly added relation are actually built in 1999-2001, as can be seen in service cards (utility installation), so they are not heritage. It is true there are some heritage buildings, so I've added them. These are found in "Map 17 - Heritage Sites" of the "Official Community Plan".

Ok, I see the source tag on a different object. This may need differentiation from a nature conservation. It's not the land being protected, it's the buildings.

What is your source for this? I live here, and have never heard of this "Conservation Area", nor does it make sense since it's developed land.

Within 24hrs, it should appear on maps, and then you can also check if the route is valid, such as with this tool: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ and change the dropdown menu from "geometry" to "Public transport routes".

Thanks very much for adding this. You'll notice I made some minor changes: the EB route was missing a single way near the end. Operator and network tags were swapped. I added route master as well.

Why can't the name tag be used on yard tracks in addition to track_ref? Otherwise, the track names don't appear on most maps.