Hey, why exactly did you make Echo Drive inaccessible? I made it inaccessible by mistake

Source: survey, also says so on their website, novanetworks.com

Hey there! Thank you for your contributions! Just letting you know that a lot of mappers in the city (myself included) consider the city and province tags redundant. We usually use the admin boundaries to derive the full address

DannyMcD, I don't understand what you're getting worked up about. Woodpeck is looking out for the integrity of the dataset, and that's a completely valid concern. Finding out that a relatively large chunk of data has been removed for seemingly no reason _is_ a valid concern. At first glance, it appeared that you specifically targeted Matthew Darwin's edits with no care as to what they actually were, and a change-set description longer than a single word would have probably prevented any misunderstanding.

I may utilize the data more than I contribute, but I still care about the accuracy and integrity of the data all the same.

Furthermore, I'm not sure what "almost immediate" means to you, as I came to you about some addresses you deleted yesterday _after_ woodpeck contacted you.

I'm sure no one wants you to feel personally attacked, instead, I'm sure people just want you to understand that if you are going to revert changesets, take a moment to care for what you're actually reverting, and let others know there actually was thought put into it. Otherwise, without knowing the full context, we're just going to assume things, and that may result in assuming the worst.

Hey there, is there any particular reason why you removed all those addr:housenumber's? They seemed sound to me

Ah, yeah. It appears to have been a misunderstanding on my part. I was most concerned with way/44360044, which wasn't created correctly in the first place. and most of the points you deleted were orphaned, not just tagless. I should have taken a closer look as to why the ways have been included in your changeset, instead of assuming what I did, sorry.

Nodes with no tags can still be children of ways, and if the way was a closed polygon before, deleting some of its child nodes would result in it being an unclosed polygon. However, there's a chance that these polygons weren't created right from the beginning, and I'm sorry if that was the case.

fyi: This changeset appears to have resulted in a lot of invalid polygons. Nodes without tags can be used simply as points to draw geometry with.

I see where you're coming from. The fact that the categorization of admin boundaries isn't even consistent within Canada (Every province except Nunavut and and BC use 6 for major cities) can be difficult to work with and would require advance-knowledge of how admin boundaries are categorized from place to place, it's just that every edit I've seen adding addr:city to places around here has always been (eventually) reverted.

fyi, adding city to building addresses is considered redundant since we already have administrative boundaries defined.

fyi, adding city to building addresses is considered redundant since we already have administrative boundaries defined.