Yeah, this is the changeset you've been looking for. I'm not sure what Max-- was using as a source, it would be nice to know. If there is no response, I'd suggest just reverting it.

A few items were added in North Vancouver in this changeset, can you confirm that they actually exist and weren't just an accident?

I can't find any reference to the fee online. Do you know how much it is?

I asked on clubtread and Bill Kinkaid said that it is not a officially maintained trail, but it goes (see http://forums.clubtread.com/8-british-columbia-mainland/71946-fat-dog-trail-summer.html and https://mountaincathedrals.wordpress.com/2014/06/22/38/)

There's certainly a trail below the treeline, so I figured it was just something that people didn't typically use in the summer because access from Blackwell Peak was easier. You might be right though.

What's up with way 53054452? It's named "Grantham Canal" but it doesn't have a waterway=canal or waterway=drain tag.

I was working on a "broken ploygon" task from http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/

In this case I removed a building=house tag on the path there.

There we go: osm.org/changeset/39714106

Hmm, It looks like I made a mistake. I thought a hedge was supposed to be a closed polygon. I was trying to work on an error identified by http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/ but either I got the wrong error or "to-fix" is wrong. I'll revert the edit.

What did you use as a source for the Student Union Building (Building S) in this changeset?

I've been trying to figure out how to get coordinates for newly built features since the imagery is out of date and surveying with gps is a lot of work and is not terribly accurate.

I made a comment on this changeset: osm.org/changeset/31387402

Any advice on how to do this to the rest of the national forests in the PNW? It would be nice to separate some of the other alpine areas and lakes that are within the "forests"

This may provide more contest: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/44763/tagging-us-national-forests

The ideal thing to do would be to separate the forest polygons and then exclude the water features using multipolygons, but these polygons are so large, that this is difficult to do.

I'll take a look into the other National Forests. In the case of Mount Hood, someone already made a separate polygon for the forest (so that the alpine area around mount hood could be separated).

Sure.

> I'd be hard pressed to say that more than 50% of the MBSNF

I didn't mean to imply that, but there are significant areas (maybe 10%) that are alpine, lakes, rivers, avalanche paths, or otherwise.

Take a look at Baker Lake, for example. Once the tiles are finished refreshing, it will look like a mangrove forest or something like that. That's because according to the map data now, there is a forest in the lake, and it's not possible to exclude it from the forest at the moment, without also excluding it from the park, which would be incorrect.

I believe I was the one who last changed it because I figured it was just a mistake in someones importer. While "National Forests" in the US should be at least 50% forested terrain, they're aren't necessarily completely forests, and this is definitely true with the northern half of Mount Baker - Snoqualmie National Forest. I think it would be better if the forests were tagged separately.

That is a duplicate, I think. I didn't realize that the road had a `sidewalk` tag on it (because it wasn't getting rendered by mapnik). Also, I only mapped the sidewalk on one side because that was all I surveyed at the time.

My first reaction would be to prefer footways (though it appears that I missed the pedestrian crossings), because they can be more detailed, and correspond more directly to physical objects. However, you make a good point when it comes to routing software.

I can't say I have any strong opinions. Also, now that I think about this a little more, it seems to that mapping footways and adding the sidewalk tag don't necessarily preclude each other...

I haven't been to the thrift store mapped in this changeset, but there's some one-ways on the map right now that are inaccessable (for one, there's no way to get onto it, and for the other, there's no way to get off of it).

Interesting, The Gardens seems to be tagged properly, but it's not rendering right. Is this a bug in the renderer?