One more building tag deleted from you: osm.org/relation/6423495/history source of the name change?

Again you deleted building=yes from here osm.org/relation/2057576/history and also removed galician name (name:gl) you better put the leisure=stadium tag just here: osm.org/way/24929824 I forgot how many times I told you that

One more building tag deleted: osm.org/way/300010873/history

Even if it is identical to the name, you should not remove name:he tag here when more languages are set: osm.org/way/156591449/history

Your idea of "improvements" still means revoming meaningful tags such as building=yes insead of maybe creating a multypoligon? osm.org/way/584967778/history

Ciao, ho corretto le strade che si incrociavano e sovrapponevano, ci sono divieti di svolta particolari per caso? c'è un semaforo?

Nothing, that's why you shouldn't have deleted it.

Buildings should not overlap, use building:part instead

Here we got three overlapping buildings, and a duplications of stadium tags, fixed.

One more building tag deleted, reverted: osm.org/relation/1639197/history

Ciao Denis, ho notato per caso il nome di questa strada, "Valter GI", è corretto? A prima vista sembra un refuso. Grazie

You did it wrong again, this one is the entire stadium area: osm.org/way/118937308 this relation represents the built stands, and you deleted the building tag once again: osm.org/relation/1637098/history

And how do you know Bing is accurate here? Are you a local?

Don't you think they were separate buildings for a reason maybe? Those had names, which you deleted: osm.org/way/126030906/history osm.org/way/126030913/history

By "improvements" you mean deleting the stadium area? Reverted

Why did you deleted the building tag here? It was correct before you "improved" it, now we got two stadiums instead of one.

One feature, one element, why do you duplicate the name?

How on earth you "improved" this deleting two building sections? http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=62005068 Please stop

Why did you delete the building tag here? And how do you know Bing imagery should be better aligned? Plese STOP doing worldwide edits this way, read the wiki and try to understand how OSM works BEFORE continuing. It's hard to find any improvements in your edits. An please go on to correct your own mistakes and reply to changeset comments: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8570285

Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, le immagini di Bing sono piuttosto male allineate, per disegnare gli edifici ti suggerisco di prendere come riferimento la carta tecnica regionale che è più precisa, nel menu "Sfondo" sulla destra, si chiama "Lombardia - Italy (CTR DBT)"