I do not agree, if you use overpass you will see that useage of admin_level in combination with boundary=historic is widely used, while was:admin_level or disused:admin_level is sporadic

I agree that this might not be the best solution, but it is not wrong to have admin_level on boundary=historic because it gives you more info what that historic boundary was. I would not delete it so easily just because someone could make an error.

There are lot of errors where administrative tag is deleted just because ID editor has "not so friendly" user interface but still we can correct the issues. There is a fair amount of tools for catching and fixing these errors so I would not go on removing some tags just to prevent some things. Data should be removed just in cases when it is totaly wrong. In this case I thing that admin_level tag should be restored.

Hi Garmin-User,
can you tell me why you have removed admin_level=4 from some historic boundaries? This is useful info and that is mentioned on osm.wiki/Tag:boundary=historic?uselang=en-GB

Takođe, bilo bi korisno da se pridružiš OpenStreetMap RS Telegram grupi radi brže komunikacije i smernica, pošto ima dosta stvari koje bi trebalo da ispraviš https://t.me/osm_sr

hvala na odgovoru, ne stavljamo prosečne brzine, već koje su zvanična ograničenja. Molim te da prepraviš sve koje su tako stavljane. Takođe, obrati pažnju na uslovna ograničenja, ona koja imaju dopunsku tablu, tipa ograničenje je 80 ali je po snegu 40, postoji način da se taguje, ako ti treba pomoć piši

Can you fix the geometries, level, and other attributes in this changeset, looks broken now

Thanks

Be sure that you add proper role to the relations, there were couple that had inner instead of outer

Hi Santanaloba53,
you are constantly breaking administrative relations. Can you check and fix these, or just stop breaking them again and again?

Hi,
I saw that you removed relation osm.org/relation/6556338 Can you tell me if this was intentional and if yes, are there new admins that need to be created?

Can you please fix the relation of Puerto nuevo trudille

Reverted in changeset 146867633.
Can you please help fixing these issues?

I have a question too, what is the purpose of switching the names from the node to a realation and from the relation to the node?

You have changed name:en from The Bahamas to Bahamas on the relation, and from Bahamas to The Bahamas on the node

Can you, for a while, stop doing these changes and discuss them on the osm forum?

More of a question, because I have seen that you have made some corrections to place polygons osm.org/way/480335508/history and just was curious if you have some source that could be used for places since they look well grouped to be drawn as a polygons

Hi topius,
what do you think about adding a place tag to a polygon?

Why you have removed the place tag from osm.org/way/1146172473 there are a lot of neighborhoods around.

Thanks for (as always) detailed answer. So there are districts at admin_level=5 that are not mapped so far. I have seen that you have done a lot of great work adjusting the boundaries.

Na osnovu čega je ovde stavljeno da je ograničenje brzine 40?

I would rather go with osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Ddesert

my combination would be:

natural=desert
surface=salt
geological=salt_pan
water=lake
intermittent=yes
salt=yes
seasonal=wet_season

I think this describes it more precisely during most of the time within the year.

Hi Wilmer,
is this some new administrative division in Venezuela? Can you give me more details, or some website where I can read about it?