OpenStreetMap
Notên AsgerFrank
Notên ku ji aliyê AsgerFrank ve hatiye şandin an şîrovekirî li ser
| Id | Çêker | Danasîn | Wextê çêkirinê | Guherandinê dawîn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4659554 | Fest |
||||
| 4614731 | PiaNottingham | This path has been removed |
|||
| 4568432 | berkel_ | Sport24 Outlet flytter hertil i marts 2025 via StreetComplete 60.0 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4390314 | Walsonde | Parkbank #OsmAnd |
|||
| 4386013 | Cycleguy13 | I think the "rice" cafe/shop is there, will try to add #OsmAnd |
|||
| 4568454 | berkel_ | Beck og Jørgensen via StreetComplete 60.0 Attached photo(s):
|
|||
| 4623500 | Troels Arvin | https://kirkenskorshaer.dk/soenderborg/genbrugsbutikker-genbrugsbiler does not mention any shop at this location; it's probably gone(?) |
|||
| 4495404 | 761776 | Den pågældende vej, hvor cursoren står hedder ikk Kelstrup Kystvej men Kelstrupvej. Bedes rettet da mange kører forkert, når de anvender deres GPS.
|
|||
| 3557578 | Niels Elgaard Larsen | stop flixbus lombardo expressen |
|||
| 670597 | AsgerFrank | Shouldn't this way (highway=footway) be more appropriately tagged? The way is part of a LCN-bicycle-route, relation 3322620, therefore some tagging allowing cycling seems required. I stumbled over this, browsing the opencyclemap for edit-hints on relations in general (no survey). Incidentally, the route does not appear very "route-like" as the ones I'm familiar with so far. Apparently it merely reflects plain bicycle markings, but maybe it serves a purpose (in GB). |
