To the Three Commenters who provided feedback to yesterday evening’s Diary post: “Thank you!”
It feels a bit counterintuitive, but I am not overly familiar with Social Media. I haven’t logged in to Facebook in over 4 years… I’m on a computer all day, and the last thing I want to do when I get off work is stare at another screen. That being the case, I am surprised at the speed of replies to my post. :)
And thank you for the recommendation of “Key:protect_class” ~ Looks like what I was needing!
============
GeoJSON
So, it turns out that JOSM can read JSON files. (Yay!) But it is not happy if I try to import a multipart polygon from a JSON file. And I really don’t want to make the OSM Community or JOSM unhappy.
So I built a little model in ArcGIS last night. It steps through my WMA boundaries feature class, splits multipart polygons into single part polygons, and transforms the latter into GeoJSON files projected into WGS_1984. There’s some fancy renaming too (honestly, it isn’t very fancy, but it keeps the output from being a total mess).
I now have GeoJSON files for 407 singlepart polygons. The 4 representing Broken Bow WMA have already been used to replace my hand-digitized attempt from earlier in the week.
Worries
My current worries revolve around topology.
- Areas managed by my Agency don’t always match up with other areas’ boundaries by conscious/cooperative design
Within my Agency, we use a Conformal Conic projection (NAD 1983) since it minimizes area/shape warping, and keeps distances comparable. But even when I reproject my data to Web Mercator, it doesn’t match up well to other’s boundaries even when that is expected.
- Should I simply match my areas to what is currently in place?
-
I know where my Corner Location is in a ‘survey control point’ sort of way, but it is a few feet off from what is already in place.
- Do Editors match their Points, Lines, and Areas based on Mercator-Warped Basemap Imagery?
- Or is a more precise [transformed] series of coordinates preferred?
[[Edit: Grammar]]
Абмеркаванне
Камэнтар sektov ад 27 Травень 2022 у 19:37
US admin boundaries mostly originate from TIGER; if they haven’t got fixed due to the personal initiative of some mappers they may be extremely off.
No. Your data is authoritatively correct; if your transformation is accurate as well you shall not worsen this in any kind.
OSM has been bad at alignment from the start (inaccurate GPS, badly aligned Bing imagery, badly aligned imports). You are lucky to bring more “survey control lines” into OSM by your import.
Камэнтар vorpalblade ад 31 Травень 2022 у 14:54
With respect to
What version of JOSM are you using? As of JOSM r18441 (a new tested version (r18463) was released on 2022-05-29), it should support random geojson files better. See JOSM #22022 for more information.
Anyway, geojsons with multipart geometries should work better now. If it doesn’t, feel free to open a new ticket.