Das sind beides jeweils Grundstückszufahrten auf Privatgrund, in -besitz.
Dort stehen Schilder mit "Privatweg" + Schrittgeschwindigkeit (=4 km/h).
Grüße

Habe ich entsprechend eingepflegt - auch wenn ich es für kleinlich halte.
Meiner Meinung nach hätten hier die bereits gesetzten Eigenschaften "abandoned" + die entsprechend Beschreibung ausgereicht - aber wenn es Dich glücklich macht...

I changed it here - as wished...

Appears a bit pettifogging from my point of view.
Path is impassable, even by donkey and Croatian state is NOT Germany - they don't put forbids(igns) everywhere ;-)

I won't use a horsemans-scale, cause I'm not a horseman.
So in the end the result is 'less information'.

Hi there,
I get your point and I think you're right, so far - but:
This path is physically impassable by horse or bike - so I mapped this feature, because I know this.
So I'm going to keep puting a "no" here, when a path is impassable by bike/horse and put a "yes" only when the path is designated for horse/bikes.
What do you think?

Please don't do this - there's a reason, why I put an additional POI on some objects I map.
It is to provide this information in mobile apps (like OSMAND~) - and these objects ARE POI.

If you like, you can have a look on my long explanation (to another user):

Hi there,

see it as a kind of service I provide ;-P

As mentoined before I use OSM primally on my mobile via OSMAnd~, while exploring lonely to lost places.
I put additional nodes on buildings/structures/specific dangers of interest to provide more information for OSMAnd~Users via the "point of interest" function of the app.
Otherwise it wouldn't be possible to get this infos while navigating or exploring offline, because the offline dataset of OSM doesn't provide this level of detail for 'simple buildings' etc.. Keep in mind that in some areas I've mapped there isn't any cellular radio avialable - eg. in the Southern military facilities of Lastovo.
After all I can't see any disadvantage in this procedure. Let me know, if you find one.

Hi there,

see it as a kind of service I provide ;-P

As mentoined before I use OSM primally on my mobile via OSMAnd~, while exploring lonely to lost places.
I put additional nodes on buildings/structures/specific dangers of interest to provide more information for OSMAnd~Users via the "point of interest" function of the app.
Otherwise it wouldn't be possible to get this infos while navigating or exploring offline, because the offline dataset of OSM doesn't provide this level of detail for 'simple buildings' etc.. Keep in mind that in some areas I've mapped there isn't any cellular radio avialable - eg. in the Southern military facilities of Lastovo.
After all I can't see any disadvantage in this procedure. Let me know, if you find one.

Lastovo is 'my little baby' - it was poorely mapped when I firstly arrived there and there's still so much work to do...
I will continue - time after time - so feedback is welcome! :-)

I've nothing to hide - so for me there's no problem in having my work supervised by you ;-)

Believe me - I allways take a look in the wiki, before I start mapping. In this case the documentation was a bit conflicting - the wiki about tag "highway=crossing" says crossings have to be a "node" and the wiki about the key "crossing" says it can be a "node" and/or "way"...
So my initial decision was to chosoe ways, to show the dimensions...
I've just changed that - so now all zebracrossings on mainstreet of Punta Mujeres are nodes and descriped precisely. :-)

See:
osm.org/changeset/132794005

POIs sind entsprechend editiert.

Ich würde Dich bitten anderen Mappern keine Fristen zu setzen - das kommt nicht gut.

Im Rahmen eines OSMAnd~ Updates wurden anscheinend einige von mir INTERN gesetzte POIs ungewollt & unbemerkt hochgeladen.

Ich schaue es mir gerade an und editiere die entsprechenden POIs bzw. lösche sie entsprechend.
Danke für den Hinweis. :-)
Ich bearbeite OSM i.d.R. browserbasiert am Desktop und setzte lediglich die Tags mobil per App in MEINE offline-OSM (zwecks Geolocation...)

Entgegen Deiner Vermutungen hatte ich deine(n) Kommentar(e) hier nicht bemerkt/gesehen - obwohl ich "in der Zwischenzeit hier online war"...
Erst deine PM habe ich dann bemerkt.