Thanks for the update and we are glad that the Maxar Imagery service comes back.

I am wondering is there any way that we can report the quality problem of Maxar imagery. Sometime I found that in some are Maxar is elder than the images provided by other services (like ESRI or bing). In some places the Maxar imagery is serving worse quality than before thought its data is newer. Major issues can be foggy images or serious distortion. Besides, in some cases Maxar is missing data for populous city or town for many years - it will be nice if we can see the data in this area in the future.

Thanks for everyone’s efforts.

The image distortion in Maxar is extremely horrible and it makes the mapping work become very painful. You can see obvious curve along a straight road now. Houses are facing different direction though they are facing the same direction in the real world.

Besides, in some locations, Maxar is out of dated and it’s data is older than DG Premium imagery.

In summary, Maxar maybe suitable for small scale mapping as supplemental data source. It’s hard for me to trust it for large-scale mapping