Hi peace2,

I would change osm.org/relation/7417118 to a boundary relation and create a new one for the landuse.

Best wishes

Hi Someone Else,

osm.org/node/9742244789 is interestingly solitaire.

Please don't slurp buildings into OSM with such a bad quality: osm.org/way/1062541097/history

Please use more specific changeset comments, especially for such a large editing window.

highway=primary is too high for this road

"by more experienced editors" must be a joke: Timothy Smith has once been blocked for blindly and wrongly applying autovalidator changes: osm.org/user_blocks/3277

Dear Mondal,

probably you were encouraged to only use changeset comments. Please read https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-April/086458.html

Hi Mark,

do you know the gauge of these tracks?

Why are you adding tidal=no to a mountain lake?

Hi Memoire,

I would only map streams with "final precision", so they don't need to be touched ever again. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113735189

Kind regards

Hi btwhite,

does osm.org/way/10584196/history "absolutely" not exist, or is it just not permissible to walk there?

Please keep your changeset window small.

osm.org/way/694490169 ?

Honorable Dwangchuk,

please use verbose, self-explaining changeset comments instead of a generic phrase like "updated": osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Is this a joke? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121212066

If Microsoft produces footprints like osm.org/way/1061867263 – shall we really import them?

Where is osm.org/way/1049853806/history gone?

Please check osm.org/way/1061528829

Check your "streets": https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121035447

U are troll.