what's the reason for this mass deletion? I did spend some time adding those footways to the map and you're trashing it because "Removed Footpaths Placed on Sidwalks". Well, you just had to add the proper sidewalk tag if you thought they were sidewalks. Instead it seems like you decided to first delete my footpaths, then another mapper added them to the map and you replaced the tag he used with the exact same tag I used at first. What the heck, wasn't easier to just leave the footway I added?

hi there, welcome to osm, please keep in mind that you're not editing your private map, you'r editing data which was added by other mappers, who did put some efforts and time into it.
I'm looking at your edits and this one looks not really appropriate https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=56426467
You did delete a temple with some proper tags just like religion, denomination and so on, and replaced it with a building=yes + name=*. If you thought the building shape was wrong you only had to update it's shape, not delete it and add it back with half of the info it had before.
The same works for some footways you deleted and added back. Problem is, the one you added are not connected to the rest of the road network, if I look at the map I cant understand hot to get on those footways now.

osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dstone
cosa ne pensi?

ciao, grazie mille per la risposta puntuale. Credo sia il primo caso di masso che mi trovo a dover mappare, cerco sulla wiki se esiste un tag adatto.

hi there, I don't think it's correct to tag this one as a tourist attraction, it's a service provided by this institution, it's not a tourist attraction. It could be compared to a treadmill inside a fitness center, you don't add the treadmill to the map as a tourist attraction, you do only add the fitness center to the map. Here as well you should add the institution name. Is it something related to blind people?

ciao, è un po' che ti vedo aggiungere questi landuse=commercial a milano, sei sicuro sia corretto? non ho ancora letto la wiki ma queste aree sono principalmente residenziali, su un edificio di tre piani di solito solo il piano terra che ha le vetrine sui marciapiedi è commerciale/retail, il resto sono appartamenti o ogni tanto uffici, io li lascerei come area residenziale.
Ciao

ciao, grazie per le modifiche in zona, ho visto che hai aggiunto alcune linee elettriche per tutta la valtellina.
Occhio però che questo tratto sono quasi certo sia una strada sterrata, non un sentiero.
osm.org/way/561898310

why did you remove that public phone? who told you it is not there anymore?

*names

what's your source for this edit? bing imagery doesn't show road name

what's your source for this edit? also, "edit" is not a proper changeset comment

yeah, thanks!

spostata vetta, aggiunta croce, dovrebbe andar bene così, grazie!

ciao, grazie per la risposta, certo, appena riesco provvedo!

ciao, sulla base di cosa hai spostato la gallerie di alcune decine di metri in direzione nord-est?
Inoltre, per favore inserisci dei commenti comprensibili quando salvi le modifiche alla mappa "(nessun commento)" non aiuta gli altri mappatori a capire cosa hai modificato.
Attendo una tua risposta, grazie, ciao!

nevermind, I did figure it out, thanks

osm.org/way/517707064

Hi there Brendand, is this actually a water area? do you have any picture of it?

is that pond real?

hi there, watch out, all those water areas have to be converted into swimming pools, they are not lakes or ponds, please replace those tags
thanks