Good afternoon, could you please look at this note osm.org/note/182455 , which is about one of your edits?
thanks

ciao, grazie per la risposta.
Non ho modo di controllare cosa dica la segnaletica escursionistica in zona (ammesso che ci sia), però ti chiederei di togliere il tag source a questo punto, perché leggendo la mappa adesso risulta Cantarso e come fonte la CTR, che però indica Cantardo.
Grazie!

Ciao, giusto per curiosità, qual è la tua fonte per questo cambio di nome?
la carta tecnica regionale lo indica come "Monte Cantardo"
Grazie

Ciao, io suggerirei di scrivere una mail a osm.wiki/Data_working_group , chiedendo il loro intervento.

great, thanks!

Hi there, I've noticed you've been adding quite a good amount of highway=give_way and highway=stop, please make sure you also add the direction=forward/backward tag, as suggested by the wiki
osm.wiki/Tag:highway=give way

Thanks!

yeah, exactly. Best practice usually implies moving a node and placing to a more accurate location; deleting the old one and creating a new one sometimes is cause of data loss, therefore it's discouraged.
I've had a look at the old water point location and also at the new one. Distance between the two of them is about 3 to 4 meters, not much, at all.
Anyway, thanks for supporting OSM project!
cheers

Hi, can you please confirm drinking water node removed here osm.org/changeset/71531238 is actually working?
Did you survey the area 22 days go?
thanks

Hi there, drinking water node you deleted was just added 22 days ago; are you sure this one doesn't exist?
what's the reason for your deletion?
thanks

Ciao, tutte le ultime tu emodifiche hanno come commento "Resurvey of Sentiero Italia CAI 2019". Riesci per favore ad inserire ogni volta un breve commento riguardante la modifica che stai salvando?
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
grazie

Hi there,welcome to OSM!
We have a note pointing out a name you added might be incorrect, could you please have a look here osm.org/note/1821342 and give us a bit more details about your edit?
thanks!

grazie!

Thanks for your reply, yes the chance does actually affect the render.
I'm going to restore the aerialway=station tag right now.
Thanks!

Ciao, occhio perché tutte le tue ultime modifiche hanno come commento "aggiornamenti monte Fae", il che non va bene. Il commento di ogni modifica dovrebbe indicare cosa è stato aggiunto/rimosso/modificato.
Per favore, quando salvi una modfica, spendi 30 secondi per inserire un commento adatto.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Grazie!

Hi again, thank you for your reply.
Well, we all make mistakes, that's not a big deal, this one was a quick fix luckily.
Relations are quite challenging at first, but they should definitely not be intimidating to you.
I'd suggest to practice on small scale multi-polygon relations, just like this one osm.org/relation/3958295 and once you get the hang of it you'll be fine editing the big ones as well.
Here you can find some examples osm.wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

Thanks again!
cheers

I suspect you tried tagging this small area osm.org/way/436000235 as a meadow, but actually selected the whole relation instead.
I've then added the landuse=meadow tag to that small area, hope it's correct, please confirm.
Thanks again!

Good afternoon Udo!
I guess you've mistakenly replaced a correct landuse=forest with landuse=meadow for this whole relation ( osm.org/relation/1329800 ), which means this whole area is now being rendered on our map as a meadow, while it's actually a proper forest.
This is what the landuse=meadow tag means osm.wiki/Tag:landuse=meadow

I do know the area pretty well and I can guarantee it's a proper forest, so I'm going to restore that.
Should you have any questions, please write here.
Thanks!

Ciao Arturo, grazie per la modifica!
Occhio però perché la ciclabile, così aggiunta, non è del tutto corretta.
Andrebbe (all'estremità nord) connessa a questo punto osm.org/node/6456760469 , non dove è connessa adesso, perché leggendo la mappa ora si intende che la ciclabile incrocia quella strada in quel punto, quando in realtà il primo punto di connessione con la strada è quello slargo per fare inversione in auto.
Secondo, il nome non credo sia "Ciclabile". Se la ciclabile è intitolata a qualcuno è corretto indicare il nome, in caso contrario il nome va omesso. Vale lo stesso per tutti gli oggetti della mappa; ciò che indica che si tratta di una ciclabile è l'etichetta highway=cycleway, non il nome. Senò seguendo lo stesso ragionamento dovremmo chiamare "Albero" ogni albero della mappa, "Casa" ogni casa e così via.
Riesci a correggere per favore?
grazie

Good morning ggorzki. As per this discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2019-June/066787.html (sorry, full Italian language there) and osm.wiki/Piste_Maps#Ski_lifts we reckoned aerialway=station is actually something more accurate than a generic aerialway=yes, therefore I'd like to restore that "station" value instead of "yes". Also, if you look at this area osm.org/#map=16/46.5280/10.0993 you'll see the northern lift has the two stations still tagged as aerialway=station, and they are showing up on the map as blue dots, while the other lift has the arrival and departure stations tagged as aerialway=yes, which are not showing up on the map.
About public_transport=station tag instead, I'm a bit confused as the relative wiki page doesn't clearly state when to use and when not to.
I do hope you'll agree with me to restore the previous station tag value then.
If you like I could do it.
Thank you

Hi ggorzki, thank you very much for your reply. I'll try sort this out with the OSM community via OSM help forum or talk-it mailing list.
Will get back to you as soon as I'll understand what's the best practice for this kind of objects
Thanks!