OpenStreetMap
CoyKoi's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 114680819 | over 3 years ago | Hi pcuser, welcome to OSM and thank you for your updates to the roads under construction in Graham. I've reviewed your changes and all looks good. Nice work leaving a note on the feature to state that it's an approximate geometry. |
| 114390457 | over 3 years ago | Hi Fabian welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits to update speed limits in new residential areas I believe that the western (rural) part of Matua Road is 80km/h, not 50km/h. My reference is AT's Speed Limit Open Data, at https://data-atgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/speed-limits/explore This will require this road feature to be split into two features (an eastern part at 50kmh, western part at 80kmh). This can be done in the editor by right-clicking a node and selecting Split (shortcut X)
|
| 114201854 | over 3 years ago | Hi cycle71, thanks for adding more detail to the map. This amenity=social_facility ('The Sands') is already represented by an object, which encompasses the whole property grounds: osm.org/way/961421687 Ideally we only want one OSM element for every real-world feature, see the guidance on the wiki here: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
|
| 113687175 | almost 4 years ago | Hi jayswipe, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding detail to footbridges. I've just reviewed your changes and everything is looking good - great to see footbridges named on the map! However this particular changeset appears to have duplicated an already existing man_made=bridge at the location: osm.org/way/466900938/ Perhaps you only wanted to add a name to that existing feature?
|
| 113376212 | almost 4 years ago | Hi skgrange,
|
| 113264103 | almost 4 years ago | Nice work. A tip regarding the satellite view: in the editor you can switch between different imagery sources. In the Backgrounds section on the right of the screen, there are several options. The default is "LINZ NZ Aerial" - which in Auckland dates to around 2017. A much more recent imagery source (2021) is "Maxar Premium Imagery" - but you'll notice it is lower resolution.
|
| 113184144 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Maximillian, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. It's great to get these local walking connections on the map!
|
| 112960418 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Sam, welcome to OSM and thanks for editing the map with your local knowledge. I love Wild Wheat I'm happy to see it on the map now. Just a note that while deleting the businesses you have also inadvertently removed the physical building. It sounds like the building is still standing, so you could have left the building object (with a single tag
|
| 112858558 | almost 4 years ago | Hey ralley, just FYI, last week there has been a new MapWithAI JOSM plugin version (1.8.6) which allows users to add buildings without merging the address points (if that is your preference).
|
| 112674064 | almost 4 years ago | I would suggest that the name for this segment of road should remain East Coast Road. Named bridges can be captured with the bridge:name tag, or by creating the bridge as a separate object, with man_made=bridge See this wiki page: osm.wiki/Key:bridge:name |
| 112644856 | almost 4 years ago | Comment contd: ... so I have left it in the 'alt_name' tag. Also re-added the MOE tags |
| 112389292 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, welcome again and thanks for the edit. You have requested a review of the changeset. From what I read on the wiki, either of the tags are suitable for these pile moorings. So man_made=dolphin was OK, but so is seamark:type=pile. Neither of those tags are rendered on the default OSM map, so you won't see any changes there. However you can see your new features on specialised viewers like https://www.openseamap.org/ One minor thing to note is that you have deleted the existing nodes, and added new nodes. It is preferable to update existing nodes (which you did do, for a couple), as this preserves the history of the data. For future reference: in the editor, you can select multiple features, and update their tags all at once.
|
| 111712021 | almost 4 years ago | Kia ora Pamela. First off- my apologies, I had incorrectly identified your changes as a bot account's automatic edit, which we occasionally see on OSM. My bad! Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap :) Your edit makes much more sense now with that 2017 marina map, which shows those lines between the pile moorings. If you haven't visited the area recently, please note there is a major construction project in the area meaning the 2017 map and the default aerial images (also from 2017) are now a bit outdated. In the editor, you can select newer imagery from the Background Settings button. I suggest Maxar Premium which is lower quality but much more recent (2021). Maxar imagery shows that at least one row of the moorings has been removed completely. In regards to the pile moorings, there are point features currently on the map, which are tagged as "man_made=dolphin". These could be updated with more fitting tags. See this page on the wiki: osm.wiki/Seamarks/Moorings It looks like there are tags described there for each rope/cable between the moorings. I wouldn't tag those as piers. Note that not all features are necessarily rendered in the default OSM map... So you might go to the effort of drawing and tagging each of those features, and still be left with 'nothing to show for it' on the map |
| 111712021 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Pamela, The pile moorings already existed on the map, and the pier connections you have drawn do not exist. This changeset also includes many other minor changes in the area which are destructive. For example the deletion of features which exist, the removal of valid tags from features, and the addition of unnecessary name tags. I will revert this changeset in it's entirety,
|
| 111114987 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Isaac welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions, I've had a look at the changesets and you've done a good job adding a new building outline, and a fenceline. in regards to this changeset - the area was already covered by landuse=residential, so adding this area is not required. And please note that a description like 'private property' is not suitable for the name tag. And in this situation (private residential suburb), this degree of detail is already implied. osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
|
| 111114853 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Isaac, welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for your contributions. In this changeset, you changed a bus stop into a fire hydrant. This was probably unintended. Please note the editor gives you a chance to review your edits, before publishing, in order to pick up accidents like this
|
| 110889040 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Paulie, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the contributions. I've reviewed the edit and it all looks good. Always nice to have restaurants kept up to date! |
| 110735129 | almost 4 years ago | No worries! Reverting is an option but it's much more complicated and only really required when there's been changes to geometry and/or deleted features. In this case just updating the tag value is totally fine - cheers
|
| 110735129 | almost 4 years ago | Thanks for following up sjhas, appreciate the background, it's interesting to hear how OSM tags are being used and how the feedback becomes an improvement of the data. In this case the Streetview image (Jan 2020) is in fact older than the Mapillary image (Nov 7 2020). The 60km/h speed limit was introduced in June 2020. Another useful reference is this AT map of recent speed limit changes around Auckland: https://atgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a13aa8469db642f283ef3ad241b71882 I did review your other changesets, and looks like they're all in line with the recent changes - thanks for keeping the map up to date :)
|
| 110735129 | almost 4 years ago | Hi there, I've just reviewed some of your recent speed limit changes. It appears in some cases you are reverting speed limits on roads which have had their speed limits changed recently.
AT Open Data:
|