Hi Bikersteve, this changeset accidentally moved a tree from Mayoral Drive onto the RNZ building on Hobson Street. Node 7851479563
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127752554

Please don't add footpaths in parking lots, when there is in fact no dedicated footpath. The highway=service is already suitable for all purposes.

Including a Czech google translate of the first comment:

Dobrý den, letecké snímky LINZ jsou 7 let zastaralé. Smazali jste mnoho věcí, které byly vytvořeny od roku 2017 v posledních přibližně 100 sadách změn. Letecké snímky Bing jsou lepší, v městském Aucklandu jsou staré asi 9 měsíců.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126872418

Hi WinnieJane, welcome to OSM and thanks for your efforts to improve the pedestrian network. Adding the 'footpaths' alongside the service parking_aisles is unnecessary. There are no physical footpaths there, and the already existing service ways are suitable for pedestrian routing. Please do not map footpaths in parking lots like this.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126923471

Thanks for fixing, this was a result of fumbling a new keyboard shortcut. Not sure why JOSM didn't flag these when I went to upload the changes it normally catches things like this for me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126499711

Fixed with CS# 126416056

I don't know how all the nodes ended up with a source=esri tag. I will try fix this now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126411726

Hi Proseperosity, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions. As you've discovered, editing coastlines can become quite complex especially when they're contained in Relations and at interfaces with rivers! I've had a go at tidying the rivermouth where you identified the coastline should end and the river begins. I used the JOSM editor which is a more powerful editor than the web iD editor, which is better suited for complex edits like this.

Hi D-AIHB, Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. Nice to see construction date information added. Note that there is a dedicated tag for capturing the construction date of features, it is 'start_date', you can read about it here on the OSM Wiki: osm.wiki/Key:start_date

Oops it looks like I deleted more turnlane relations than I intended. I will work to rectify these.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125395707

Hi Chris, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions. I've reviewed this changeset and your others from today, all looking good. Nice to see descriptive changeset comments, too.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125337316

Hi Vaibhav, thanks for using RapiD to import the LINZ buildings in Pakuranga, it's great to see the gaps filling in! I recommend checking the 'Maxar Premium Imagery' background layer while you do this. Maxar imagery is much more recent than the default 'LINZ aerial', so you will see some areas where the import buildings have been demolished and replaced with townhouses. For example 7 Udys Road:

https://mapwith.ai/rapid#background=Maxar-Premium&datasets=ef9136b079e24bbfb432be9bbdd246ff&disable_features=points,boundaries&map=19.80/-36.90943/174.88442

Large sign at the Onetangi Rd entrance to this road, stating it is private for resident's access only.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124870039

Large sign at the Onetangi Rd entrance to this road, stating it is private for resident's access only.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124870039

Hi Hontas, please take more care with your edits. Here you have deleted an existing building, and replaced it with a new building, with less detail (lost building:levels and building=commercial). Unclear why this was done I guess it was a mistake while you were editing.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124700862

Hi Hontas, why have you deleted this sports field feature? I don't believe it has been demolished.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124699146

I can see a short section of footpath alongside here, I have mapped it separately as it's own way: osm.org/way/1085013297
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124659776

Fixed the dragged address nodes: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124612629/

Hi Liam thanks for the edits I will fix the address for you, thanks for flagging the issue. If node points are getting in the way while you are editing, you can disable points in the iD editor options, so you can't accidentally delete or drag them. Also I think you meant to add trees in Caithness Park, you have added them as 'natural=wood', but this will not work, they should be 'natural=tree'. Natural=wood is used for larger wooded areas, rather than tree points. Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124588749

Hi Liam Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edits. I can see you're adding houses and buildings in New Zealand. It's quite labour-intensive to trace them all yourself, if you want you can try the RapiD editor, which facilitates importing building outlines from an existing dataset: https://mapwith.ai/rapid#background=LINZ_NZ_Aerial_Imagery&datasets=ef9136b079e24bbfb432be9bbdd246ff&disable_features=boundaries&map=18.20/-36.89937/174.88211
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124590087