"Street" and "Saint" should not be contracted to "St" in name tags osm.wiki/Abbreviations
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162632720

You have put a question mark as a bus stop name.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162577041

amenity=parking_space is not intended to represent bus-stops

Please enter a useful changeset comment describing your changes

Please use the appropriate halal tag, rather than putting it as a description in the name field.
This will improve the information in the OSM database

osm.wiki/Key:diet:halal
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161043765

Please use the appropriate halal tag, rather than putting it as a description in the name field.
This will improve the information in the OSM database

osm.wiki/Key:diet:halal
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161043765

Please stop putting descriptions in the name field.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161438929

Please do not put descriptions in the name (halal). There is an appropriate tag to capture this: osm.wiki/Key:diet:halal
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161464147

Kia ora Jeff, welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have reviewed this changeset and can see that it deleted a section of road in the viaduct, and moved a node of a service road at VTNZ at the Strand. It seems to me that these were accidental changes, so I have reverted the changes with my changeset 161188401.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161188029

Madina Halal Meats was already mapped at osm.org/node/6315306130
Please consider merging the two features rather than creating duplicates
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161040922

This is at the wrong spot. Woolworths was already mapped at osm.org/node/5157906821

Kia ora Cristian, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your edits. I have reviewed this changeset and noticed the following two issues: I can see that you added a new area for Whakanewha Regional Park, but this location was already mapped appropriately at osm.org/relation/13757909 The other issue was your edits to the Waiheke Musson survey location. I can see that you wanted to add detail to the airstrip terminal, which is good, but the survey mark feature should not have been edited to make this change. I have reverted those two changes, and added Waiheke Wings as its own new point of interest. Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159026856

Hi jmg-nz, welcome to OSM and thank you for your updates to the map! The highway features you updated from construction to residential are still showing as access=no, this tag can either be deleted entirely, or updated to a more suitable value. Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157931496

Hi adssadsad, thanks for adding the new road. Does it need to be made access=private?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157414216

Hi degreesbelowzero, welcome to OpenStreetMap, thank you for your contribution, you have filled out the values well and left a useful changeset comment. As you mention in your changeset comment, this is a temporary feature only occasionally erected. It is best-practice not to map temporary features - see this wiki page: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features

Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157320511

Hi leotherocketman, Thanks for the addition. Does the path connect to anywhere at the south end - perhaps into the carpark? Currently it's a dead end. If it does lead into the carpark, try to snap the southern end to the footway around the carpark. Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157290337

Hi Mincemeat, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. This update is great. One minor thing is that you could have updated the existing node for PK Furniture, rather than deleting and adding a whole new one. This helps maintain the history of the feature, giving a richer history in the OSM data. Cheers keep it up.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157106405

Hi EstatesBlair, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your additions. Your edits looks good. Maybe you would benefit from switching to using the more recent Bing aerial imagery (use the Background Settings button). There is an issue with your building:levels tag, which is stating that these new buildings are 1,234 storeys high! I imagine you meant to say they're 4 storeys, so I have updated the tag's value. Cheers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156845576

Thanks :)
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156680808

Hi adssadsad, thanks for adding detail to OSM. Please can you use more meaningful changeset comments when you publish your changeset, as it helps other contributors who are reviewing your changes. See the OSM wiki page here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156669584