CoyKoi's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
125395707 | almost 3 years ago | Oops it looks like I deleted more turnlane relations than I intended. I will work to rectify these.
|
125337316 | almost 3 years ago | Hi Chris, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions. I've reviewed this changeset and your others from today, all looking good. Nice to see descriptive changeset comments, too.
|
125131725 | almost 3 years ago | Hi Vaibhav, thanks for using RapiD to import the LINZ buildings in Pakuranga, it's great to see the gaps filling in! I recommend checking the 'Maxar Premium Imagery' background layer while you do this. Maxar imagery is much more recent than the default 'LINZ aerial', so you will see some areas where the import buildings have been demolished and replaced with townhouses. For example 7 Udys Road: |
124870039 | almost 3 years ago | Large sign at the Onetangi Rd entrance to this road, stating it is private for resident's access only.
|
124870039 | almost 3 years ago | Large sign at the Onetangi Rd entrance to this road, stating it is private for resident's access only.
|
124700862 | about 3 years ago | Hi Hontas, please take more care with your edits. Here you have deleted an existing building, and replaced it with a new building, with less detail (lost building:levels and building=commercial). Unclear why this was done I guess it was a mistake while you were editing.
|
124699146 | about 3 years ago | Hi Hontas, why have you deleted this sports field feature? I don't believe it has been demolished.
|
124659776 | about 3 years ago | I can see a short section of footpath alongside here, I have mapped it separately as it's own way: osm.org/way/1085013297
|
124588749 | about 3 years ago | Fixed the dragged address nodes: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124612629/ |
124588749 | about 3 years ago | Hi Liam thanks for the edits I will fix the address for you, thanks for flagging the issue. If node points are getting in the way while you are editing, you can disable points in the iD editor options, so you can't accidentally delete or drag them. Also I think you meant to add trees in Caithness Park, you have added them as 'natural=wood', but this will not work, they should be 'natural=tree'. Natural=wood is used for larger wooded areas, rather than tree points. Cheers
|
124590087 | about 3 years ago | Hi Liam Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edits. I can see you're adding houses and buildings in New Zealand. It's quite labour-intensive to trace them all yourself, if you want you can try the RapiD editor, which facilitates importing building outlines from an existing dataset: https://mapwith.ai/rapid#background=LINZ_NZ_Aerial_Imagery&datasets=ef9136b079e24bbfb432be9bbdd246ff&disable_features=boundaries&map=18.20/-36.89937/174.88211
|
103155914 | about 3 years ago | Possibly I have figured it out - the Cook Islands Topo25 maps? https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/52316-cook-islands-topo25-zone4-gridless-maps/ |
103155914 | about 3 years ago | Hi Kyle I've been editing Rarotonga and have come across a few of your edits which used this custom mapwarper layer. I'm curious what this source was? |
122645418 | about 3 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. The ways you are adding appear to be driveways. The convention is to tag these with highway=service and service=driveway. highway=residential should be reserved for the public, named roads.
|
119181974 | about 3 years ago | Agree with your point about Auckland Central, which usually is used to refer to the central suburbs of the isthmus. To me, the "Auckland" seems redundant in "Auckland City Centre". I think just "City Centre" would be better, that is what is seen on road signs for example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=279369030565390 |
120649229 | over 3 years ago | I have used the tagging already used for the existing busway. However I note that there is now a "highway=busway" tag for the purpose, but not fully supported yet (it is not rendered by carto) |
120371739 | over 3 years ago | Hi ralley, something went strangely wrong with this edit: all of the features were created as new duplicate features instead of edits to the existing features. I haven't seen this before, but I guess it will need a revert to fix it.
|
120023120 | over 3 years ago | Should probably be refined, by mapping natural features seperately from the island feature, similar to how I did Rotoroa Island |
119772775 | over 3 years ago | No worries, your initial edit was a fine start, and with the update it's now perfect :) Approximate boundary is also OK, though I will snap it to the coastline, and I'll add the hut. I like that annotation feature on the wikimedia picture, I hadn't seen that before! |
119772775 | over 3 years ago | Hi Axel, thank you for your addition of the Wharariki Ecosanctuary. You have added two features to represent it (a centre-point, and a boundary polygon). This is discouraged by the principle of "one feature, one OSM element". I would suggest in this case keeping only the boundary polygon. Also perhaps leisure=nature_reserve is a more fitting tag for this feature. OSMWiki page on this principle: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
|