I don't remeber that there is a red light before the bridge going east bound.

osm.org/node/108897379#map=19/40.32198/-78.91671

Please do not connect the building to the road.

osm.org/way/733582790#map=19/40.32596/-78.92349

When adding buildings, please check multiple imagery sources. The buildings you added have weird shapes in general and they do not reflect the reality well.

Also please check multiple imagery sources before drawing anything here. Bing is mostly unreliable in rural PA.

The quality of these building you added may need improvement.

Please avoid using source tag.

imagery_used tag will clearly record everything, there is no need to duplicate.

Since different editors will use different sources in the future, the tag you initially created may cause confusion if others do not check history.

I made some cleanups so there will be blank area (for the road) between two different green areas. But the work is not done yet, because there are too many issues.

osm.org/#map=19/40.65141/-78.40129

osm.org/way/339008750/history#map=19/40.17019/-76.96758

Please do not add them as both bridge and tunnel, it does not make sense.

What is building=building?

osm.org/relation/11796496/history#map=18/41.20913/-74.69401

What is "communication:mobile_phone_1"="yes" ?

osm.org/node/5344514644/history#map=19/41.81044/12.32897

What is building=building? osm.org/way/852158594/history#map=17/38.69888/-77.53284

This access road does NOT connect to 28th St, reverted.

osm.org/way/778808421#map=19/39.31886/-76.62494

What is "surface=2"?

Reverted: osm.org/way/5995849/history#map=19/39.31844/-76.56977

Yes some can also claim that adding tons of “”surface=paved” to every Federal Highway/State Route/National Highway will be helpful to the project, I can’t even oppose to that idea, but I feel sorry if that really happens.

The point of adding "surface=paved" is almost none here. The tag is vague.

I just wonder what motivated you to add useless paths to the map along with road for vehicles... I've removed the part between natural woods.

osm.org/way/409547870/history#map=19/39.71141/-75.73592

osm.org/changeset/35619575#map=17/39.72245/-75.74204

Please do not change any road to track without any consideration.

Do NOT connect roads if they are not in junction. Reverted.

osm.org/way/820789378

This is a turning loop (island).

osm.org/node/136175064/history

"status" tag is vague and it shouldn't be used anymore. Everything in the OSM should be at least "planned" or "constructed".

"access" tag is not necessarily needed for the tower itself. The access to your house is obviously private, to the cell towers owned by tower company, they are private as well.

The "operator" tag, in my opinion, is not very helpful at all. The ownership may change in the future, will you be able to track each change and update the map in the next decade?

The "website" tag you put (FCC ULS) is never an official one. The feature (cell tower) does not have anything called a website. It should be Crown Castle's company website if you specify the operator.

osm.org/#map=19/38.05955/-84.43297