DUGA's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
149587340 | about 1 year ago | Is this creek intermittent? |
116051463 | over 1 year ago | Your TIGER updates in this area is mostly questionable. TIGER cleanup is not just for the tags, geometries need to be updated and fixed. Removing all tags leaves everyone else harder to track the actual junk from 2007. |
146375571 | over 1 year ago | Please put source in the changeset but not here. |
136092725 | over 1 year ago | Please stop using AI to vandalize the map, you will be reported for nosense like this one: |
131045574 | over 1 year ago | Unfortunately it is not paved. If you do not live around, do not tag surface just based on the online photos. |
126230980 | over 1 year ago | Can you take a look and let me know which one should be kept, grass or wood? |
147434448 | over 1 year ago | Most of the driveways do not need a fancy name. |
149369008 | over 1 year ago | openstreetmap.org/way/10697021/history |
149369008 | over 1 year ago | When TIGER was imported years ago, the alignment was terrible. If you remove TIGER flags, at least you need to align them with a valid orthoimagery. Other editors will track changes based on tags, if you drop these tags while leaving the ugly alignments there, essentially everyone else will have a tough time locating TIGER junks. |
144376780 | over 1 year ago | It should be unsigned_ref, perhaps iD didn’t fill in correctly. I will get it fixed by the EOD. |
149552099 | over 1 year ago | Unfortunately, there is no threatening, you can be reported by anyone at any time even without a reason. OSM DWG will determine the issue. Based on your editing history, I will “have to” watch your edits closely. Disconnecting a river is 100% considered vandalism regardless of your intent. Attaching/drawing boundaries not 100% the same as any “official” source is actually not, just take a look at China vs India around Tibet. Back to the states, many digital boundaries you see online might not be updated, you need to be careful when importing/following them. You will not become a friend of anyone over the Internet, code of conduct is the lowest standard, and I didn’t violate it. |
149552099 | over 1 year ago | Many boundaries are based on rivers (could be centerline or bank). iD has a layer of PA boundary and we can use it, it is mostly the same as Census. |
149552099 | over 1 year ago | What you did here is completely wrong, you literally cut the river and disconnect them. PA legislature has not updated the boundary for decades, many of them used to follow rivers or street but due to terrain changes they are not accurate anymore. I don't want to argue with you over how PA legislature works, but you are required to fix the broken river way or I have to report this changeset. |
139590469 | over 1 year ago | PennDOT never numbered any town road, using ref:penndot is literally wrong. |
138965948 | over 1 year ago | I believe none of these naturally exist, they are all artificial lakes which is why I tag all of them as basin. |
109222070 | over 1 year ago | No exit is only supposed to use at the final node of a segment. Routing does not need this tag to figure out if it is a dead end or not. |
109178140 | over 1 year ago | I think that I didn’t revert, but redraw few objects |
124157552 | over 1 year ago | We have not seen you correcting any garbage after the unblock, for those including bogus addresses as well as wrong building footprints. Should we send a cease and desist letter to York County and request your managers to take a look? |
131080637 | over 1 year ago | Poor quality alert. osm.org/way/1129714484#map=19/38.70117/-76.33176 |
145839606 | over 1 year ago | Apparently low quality with unknown technology involved (like AI), please draw things better. |