OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
149587340 about 1 year ago

Is this creek intermittent?

osm.org/way/130100830/history#map=15/41.7839/-76.0521

116051463 over 1 year ago

Your TIGER updates in this area is mostly questionable.

TIGER cleanup is not just for the tags, geometries need to be updated and fixed. Removing all tags leaves everyone else harder to track the actual junk from 2007.

146375571 over 1 year ago

Please put source in the changeset but not here.

osm.org/way/1215638980/history

136092725 over 1 year ago

Please stop using AI to vandalize the map, you will be reported for nosense like this one:

osm.org/way/1172766741#map=19/41.84513/-75.59960

131045574 over 1 year ago

Unfortunately it is not paved.

If you do not live around, do not tag surface just based on the online photos.

126230980 over 1 year ago

Can you take a look and let me know which one should be kept, grass or wood?

osm.org/way/1094959048#map=19/41.86926/-75.71718

147434448 over 1 year ago

Most of the driveways do not need a fancy name.

osm.org/way/910425939/history#map=19/41.96218/-75.74332

149369008 over 1 year ago

openstreetmap.org/way/10697021/history

149369008 over 1 year ago

When TIGER was imported years ago, the alignment was terrible.

If you remove TIGER flags, at least you need to align them with a valid orthoimagery. Other editors will track changes based on tags, if you drop these tags while leaving the ugly alignments there, essentially everyone else will have a tough time locating TIGER junks.

osm.wiki/TIGER_fixup

144376780 over 1 year ago

It should be unsigned_ref, perhaps iD didn’t fill in correctly.

I will get it fixed by the EOD.

149552099 over 1 year ago

Unfortunately, there is no threatening, you can be reported by anyone at any time even without a reason. OSM DWG will determine the issue. Based on your editing history, I will “have to” watch your edits closely.

Disconnecting a river is 100% considered vandalism regardless of your intent. Attaching/drawing boundaries not 100% the same as any “official” source is actually not, just take a look at China vs India around Tibet.

Back to the states, many digital boundaries you see online might not be updated, you need to be careful when importing/following them.

You will not become a friend of anyone over the Internet, code of conduct is the lowest standard, and I didn’t violate it.

149552099 over 1 year ago

Many boundaries are based on rivers (could be centerline or bank). iD has a layer of PA boundary and we can use it, it is mostly the same as Census.

149552099 over 1 year ago

What you did here is completely wrong, you literally cut the river and disconnect them.

PA legislature has not updated the boundary for decades, many of them used to follow rivers or street but due to terrain changes they are not accurate anymore.

I don't want to argue with you over how PA legislature works, but you are required to fix the broken river way or I have to report this changeset.

139590469 over 1 year ago

PennDOT never numbered any town road, using ref:penndot is literally wrong.

138965948 over 1 year ago

I believe none of these naturally exist, they are all artificial lakes which is why I tag all of them as basin.

109222070 over 1 year ago

No exit is only supposed to use at the final node of a segment. Routing does not need this tag to figure out if it is a dead end or not.

osm.org/way/10733206/history#map=19/41.97973/-75.74534

109178140 over 1 year ago

I think that I didn’t revert, but redraw few objects

124157552 over 1 year ago

We have not seen you correcting any garbage after the unblock, for those including bogus addresses as well as wrong building footprints. Should we send a cease and desist letter to York County and request your managers to take a look?

131080637 over 1 year ago

Poor quality alert. osm.org/way/1129714484#map=19/38.70117/-76.33176

145839606 over 1 year ago

Apparently low quality with unknown technology involved (like AI), please draw things better.

osm.org/way/1236592272#map=19/39.54231/-79.23443