DavidKarlas's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
145488434 | over 1 year ago | Ali je osm.org/node/11451459141 duplikat od osm.org/node/6274575031? |
146684455 | over 1 year ago | Just curious, how can one lighthouse have 63 lights such as osm.org/node/1211591064?
|
145159151 | over 1 year ago | Thank you!
|
144823163 | over 1 year ago | Did you delete osm.org/relation/1268072 intentionally? |
143564715 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, could you please pay attention on direction of coastline, because currently most of islands you added in this changeset are point inward, hence they will be rendered as water and not insland. Thank you,
|
143552192 | almost 2 years ago | In original comment you said that many buildings are not visible on "Bing Maps Aerial", I'm just saying they all are, I'm not saying this is good or bad source for tracing buildings.
|
143552192 | almost 2 years ago | @woodpeck I'm not sure I 100% agree, if you look closely at https://osmcha.org/changesets/143552192/
|
142458169 | almost 2 years ago | Hi, some of islands you mapped are in wrong direction, you need to pay attention that arrows on coastline points outwards to sea. For example this islands will not render correctly:
Best regrads,
|
140994303 | almost 2 years ago | Reverted because bad data |
138882757 | about 2 years ago | Hi, looks like you deleted relation osm.org/relation/3718740 that was representing Irepodun(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irepodun,_Osun). Why was this deleted? Does it not exist anymore? Can you link to source stating this change? Thank you,
|
138866540 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for quick response, looks like osm.org/relation/3718747 is missing part of polygon and osm.org/relation/3718729 has that part extra. Do you want to fix this or should I? Thank you,
|
138866540 | about 2 years ago | Hi, looks like multiple boundaries were broken in process of editing, can you try correcting them to form polygon again?
Thank you,
|
138511150 | about 2 years ago | Hi, I noticed that you added to many relations osm.org/relation/1953566 as member relation.
Thank you,
|
138337817 | about 2 years ago | Can you explain and give more details why you changed from admin_level=7 to admin_level=5? If this is intentional change, can you also update other relations on admin_level=7 and admin_level=5 to not overlap/create holes? |
138310946 | about 2 years ago | Reverted this change to bring back Amazonas as admin_level=4 admin of Brazil |
136113706 | about 2 years ago | Hi,
Thank you! |
136056205 | over 2 years ago | Hi, what is reason for removing boundary=administrative tag from this relation, it seems perfectly valid tag to have on this relation? Thank you,
|
135761116 | over 2 years ago | This has broken many relations, including Argentina and Paraguay, can you fix it?
|
135741265 | over 2 years ago | Hi, it looks like relations osm.org/relation/14772103 and osm.org/relation/3203339 got broken by this change. Can you try to connect them back together?
|
131483143 | over 2 years ago | name:zh tag on osm.org/relation/13824732 seems to have accidental content, was that intentional? |