DeBigC's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
84929105 | over 3 years ago | `The back lane (north of Dunluce Road, and south of Furry Park Rd has two versions. One version is a hammerhead arrangement which I don't think is correct. Seems like the garages all along the back lots would need access.... worth a quick review |
19556695 | over 3 years ago | I have been here and the house numbers seem to be wrong on Ardmore Close. The row on the south of the street goes from 2A to 40A as mapped in this changeset, but on the ground all those numbers are uneven and seem to me to go from 1A to 40A. Good tracing of the buildings though. I want to add in more detail on extensions and sheds/garages. |
116167760 | over 3 years ago | No, I just forgot to put that one back. There were a load of nodes stacked together here, two landuses, the roads and something else, so I may have forgot to put that back at the end. The root of the problem is a small pocket park was traced as if it was sitting right up against the pathways opposite, adding 10-15% to the size of that landuse |
116188189 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for getting that for me. I forget my own notes :) |
98466742 | over 3 years ago | If you think that's the better thing to do be my guest Daniel. I'm busy mapping in Dublin closer to home these days. |
98466742 | over 3 years ago | That's great Daniel - the I was aiming for was this: osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre The place is actually described here as a day care centre for young people with various needs
I should have left a building tag on it but perhaps I wanted to select something less generic that =yes |
98466742 | over 3 years ago | The building is a community centre I think, so I was correct, but fell short if I didnt use amenity=community_centre |
5539876 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for these interpolations, I was able to get the buildings fully mapped and addressed |
110186441 | over 3 years ago | Where do you specifically see an issue? Street name and numbers... |
115587001 | over 3 years ago | Wonky construction I think, but I do see an unclosed one. Oh well, omlettes and broken eggs. |
63386202 | over 3 years ago | You left a fixme a these tracks (on the construction site). They are gone now, I have removed them. |
21566088 | over 3 years ago | Landuses are overlapping here. I agree they may touch, but not overlap |
45675553 | over 3 years ago | North of the Curragh army barracks is the Curragh racecourse. The area has been substantially redesigned and redeveloped, so I had to delete or repurpose your pathways and barriers. The sat imagery I used is still showing four major construction zones, so I just used that. |
31131371 | over 3 years ago | What is this building. I don't see "dorms" in the area you marked them. Has there been a demolition? |
20445307 | over 3 years ago | There are a number of unusual tagging decisions here. Mainly the use of area=yes, which isn't a good way to tag as it adds unnecessary layers. Secondly the items being tagged are hedges, which should not be represented in area style, instead unclosed ways and barrier=hedge is required. Finally, in pure and simple geometry there are overlapping landuses here and there which automatically creates a error. I appreciate this could be contributions from other authors. Let me know if you have the time to fix this as it requires a tidy up, and I am doing the buildings and trying to pass by this area quickly. |
17883830 | over 3 years ago | Thanks for getting the number interpolations in Esker Lane. I was able to add them to the building objects I am mapping there. If you are still in that area I would be glad of any more you might have. |
114304549 | over 3 years ago | I can't see where you mean. We are supposedly using a task manager to stop this |
13729318 | over 3 years ago | Hi Andrew, I am labelling these two buildings as houses |
110414867 | almost 4 years ago | The interpolation in Ventry Avenue went up to 32, but was two rows too far up. I moved it and left it there for you to note, and applied the house numbers. I was confident of this because the road is West(even) East(odd) and started at 1 and 2 in the north and progressed south. |
102014681 | almost 4 years ago | I couldn't see why this was a relation. Osmose says this is a mistake in any case, so I just made it into a closed way |