DeBigC's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
33038551 | about 4 years ago | Spring Garden Street as it touches Annesley Place has a little shopping district, which indeed deserves a landuse, but it seems to be having a polygon identity crisis as it trims around the building edges - impossible. The other problem, unless there is a different railway embankment to what my poor Mapillary suggests is that the commercial landuse veers out over/under the bridge to the west. What do you reckon? |
81169255 | about 4 years ago | I have used the new Bing Satellite to remap the partial completion of residential building here. Each group of connected houses needs to use the parent tag building=*, where * is a more specific value you may have knowledge about. I got rid of the "ugly" landuse polygons arbitarily drawn around each group of buildings and replaced it with one single Daneswell. |
56446498 | about 4 years ago | @Eoin O'Mahony @VictorIE both of you drew a man_made=water_tower at this location. The one with the earliest date is retained, the later one deleted. |
92891783 | about 4 years ago | The Botanic Visitor's Centre, while indeed is a sort of campus of collected buildings is miss-tagged as if a single building here. I am splitting these up. In the meantime it may be worth thinking about if some kind of polygon would be appropriate. That is easily added later if there is something suitable. |
108536068 | about 4 years ago | Ok, I agree with those changes but I would highly recommend to you that you alert people to changes you are going to make. I was working on buildings at the time you did that and because I edit slowly and methodically in Dublin I was wondering why an editing conflict happened on a few of my objects. Being mannerly I relented on my changes and left yours in place. Please don't map like this again in Ireland without first dropping an email to board@openstreetmap.ie or jump into our Telegram group. Its not what you do its the way that you do it. I bet if you asked first nobody would have a problem. Not trying to be unfriendly, so take this in the right way please. |
80378433 | about 4 years ago | The building that replaced these demolished ones at Ardilaun is now erected. It is visible on the current bing, so I am going to get rid of those and put the new one in. If only I had some recent mapillary to verify height and usage...... :) |
75288363 | about 4 years ago | I am changing the majority of the nodes you contributed to sketch out the stadium. Unfortunately you joined some of these to residential landuses (contributed 2011-2014) which are wrong/changed now, and also you missed out on a lot of the land holding for the stadium. Being local to here I am going to place it precisely on the GAA landholding, which co-incides with their outer stadium wall. |
11003257 | about 4 years ago | The landuse=brownfield that was applied here in 2012 is no longer required as I see residential here now https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.36586621160319&lng=-6.247545008577731&z=18.773893928674994&pKey=300630731600839&focus=photo&x=0.4049555145635672&y=0.6534970835116952&zoom=1.3777267508610793 |
108536068 | about 4 years ago | What exactly are you doing? You need to state what roof tag you are blitzing please. Im aware of one that keeps causing problems, but you are meant to be more specific when you do such big mass edits, and you should talk to us through our chapter to let us know you are hitting a big nuclear change button. |
93304257 | about 4 years ago | The link there shows that the "Centre for the Visually impaired" site has been subdivided and on the south and east there is a large new residential development. I had to chop it based on what I could see, but because of node pile ups the landuse is out a little. I'm going to fix the buildings and apply their addresses, then rationalise the cacophany of joined walls, landuses, areas and highways that are sitting there. Have a look here is you can, leave me the buildings as I have numbers |
93304257 | about 4 years ago | |
92308064 | about 4 years ago | @Eoin O'Mahony the parking area here, while this is what it is used for is not formally designated for this. Very probably a tree clump was left here and the tree died or was damaged. The use of it as a parking area is not signposted. I don't see an issue with representing it as having a capacity, but 10 seems high. I reduced down the size of the area, as you drew it with the roadway included. I also removed the private=access, there is no such private holding over ground that is clearly in the public realm. |
24623381 | about 4 years ago | exact location: osm.org/changeset/24623381#map=19/53.39322/-6.28810 |
24623381 | about 4 years ago | @VictorIE Can you let me know about the commercial building off Grove Road here, seems to be a backland. I don't see it anymore and there are 7 new houses squeezed in |
56244675 | about 4 years ago | The open space here at the junction of Cardiff Castle road would normally be represented with the tag landuse=grass, and not natural=woods. Other tags can be added to it if there is more attribution to help define it. The trees on it are then best represented as natural=tree and the geometry used for this is the point. |
77847423 | about 4 years ago | At the LIDL store North Road I had to rotate and slightly re-shape the building to ground truth. The Car park needed to be adjusted as a consequence. I think works there changed the car-park 2+ years ago, this v of bingmaps seems to relflect that. |
104850632 | about 4 years ago | This was the moment when the animator was drawing the arrival of our heros at the Castle Arr...ggghhhh |
107024425 | about 4 years ago | Yes, deliberately. I need the input of somebody locally to resolve the location of the post office, also, to ascertain if Labrokes is gone or remains, and there is a third issue which I will remember when I open it. I am Liaising with Mr_Mapgie, who lives just east of there and will be able to answer these. Until then please leave the pin doubles, I will take them away when he replies |
25823662 | about 4 years ago | I am taking out those buildings in Popintree Park. It seems they are long since gone, assuming you traced them off older imagery |
106445922 | about 4 years ago | Thanks for fixing that |