I'm going to replace the building realtion you have here because it isn't a polygon with an enclosed area. Not even close to being that. I do guess you may have seen some foundations?? Either way the present imagery and a little bit of local knowledge will do to fix it

Ah, hope you reversed that

I can't see anything except maybe I took a node off it that joined it to something. I have no idea about these lines, especially where they are amalgams of any available line, they haven't been touched for years. Maybe it is supposed to be that shape

Hi noelf. It is possible to make the building shapes more accurate by orthogonalising them. You seem to us the ID editor, so if you select the building object and press S the four corners will conform to 90 degree angles. Have a look around the area, I have improved a few of the shapes

Yes it is. I left it there for the moment as it seems to be bleeding through the terracing tool and applying that name in place of the addr:housenumber=*. Never saw this problem before.

The Parnell Pub here is now gone several years and it appears as though there are houses, and maybe a shop - though empty - on the outer property beside the main road. I will change the landuse and include the new buildings

Thank you so much for these interpolations. The mapillaries are too close to the number surfaces [high risk of blurring] and so this gave me certainty and less guesswork [and no return visits :) to this area]

How many housenumber=17's are actually on Ferryman's crossing?

I have split the object as I can see 116 on Mapillary

I have re-traced the buildings here, now they still may lack detail but they are more correct now, and I ironed out the problems with them joining at corners.

Please don't add details like your house is 12 storeys. Also, for your own privacy I have added the buildings on your row.

Hiya
When a building is higher than 3 levels and there is a skillion roof (a tilt to one side) the sat image is messing with your eyes and makes the building crooked. I have been on-site here and the building is completely orthogonal. Also, we ought to try drawing a building where it arises from the ground, rather than be drawn to the roof position, which again is very tempting. Well done on getting a few of these starting. I am putting addresses on them and ground truthing them as best as I can. Feel free to review.

I'm working on that, I hear there is a way to subdivide a relation. But if it can be done without a relation all the better.

I am addding the rest of the buildings, and their attributes for this area. I have some housenumbers=*, but local knowledge is best

This bird (Just Chicken) has flown the coop in 2018-9. Now there is a cafe called Two Boys Brew. Pins are being added infinitely as businesses come and go. Defunct businesses like this then stay cluttering up the area. Adding a pin should be a temporary holding point for a place of business, adding it to the building object is a better long-term solution I think. WIll mail you shortly.

A school would be represented by building=school for the built area and hopefully a landuse=education to capture the grounds and play areas. What was here was an admixture of a landuse and building approaches.

Confused - the building here is mapped as a landuse. It may have been brownfield in 2015, but it certainly isnt now

Deleting is not encouraged, but you can edit it

Hi - I hope you are loving OpenStreetMap. I picked up on your edits as I detect new contributors here: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/newestosm?c=Ireland#9/53.1970/-9.5622

Anyway I added more houses on your row, and added some for you to add the house numbers to. You probably don't want to just put your own place on the map on its own (just a privacy risk, but not a big risk). Let me know if I can help any more :) BigC

This place seems to be mothballed, along with all the buildings on the connecting cluster. I will leave one pin (there was a duplicate) and tag the building as discused=yes pending something else happening on that site