Biểu trưng OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

tertiary roads, TIGER and history

Do Dion Dock đăng vào 26 tháng 06 năm 2012 bằng English.

I’ve heard some debate on the mailing lists about whether importing TIGER census maps into the US was a good idea. The con argument is people look at the map and figure it’s good enough. The pro side is it put a lot of useful data in place.

Unfortunately, the quality of the TIGER data needs some improvement. For one thing, the highway= tag does not cover much ground between residential and motorway. There are lots of preferred roads, especially away from the cities, and you can’t just look at a TIGER map and know which one to take.

I’ve been applying the highway=tertiary tag to lots of the backroads in Oregon. One thing I particularly like finding are roads that have been re-routed (which is a really neat thing to look for on old maps). Take a look at the underlying Bing! image and see how Seven Mile Hill Road used to take a bit of a meander to the south.

Biểu tượng thư điện tử Biểu tượng Bluesky Biểu tượng Facebook Biểu tượng LinkedIn Biểu tượng Mastodon Biểu tượng Telegram Biểu tượng X

Thảo luận

Bình luận của Baloo Uriza vào 29 tháng 6 năm 2012 lúc 20:04

Generally speaking that should be OK for county and the main forest service routes. Secondary might be a better baseline if it’s a state highway.

Bình luận của Tom Layo vào 1 tháng 7 năm 2012 lúc 13:23

At this point in the US map, the tag is less important than the road/feature being correctly placed on the map. While the map does look deceptively good only from a high zoom, the TIGER data is a net improvement. It would take many years for users to drive or bike every road to name streets, as already done by TIGER. And I grudgingly admit that most of the data regarding naming is good, and is now available to be fixed from a user anywhere.

Đăng nhập để nhận xét