You can see here: https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8211319,34.9768313,3a,75y,200.96h,90.6t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sCIHM0ogKEICAgICGvP-QhAE!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh3.googleusercontent.com%2Fgpms-cs-s%2FAIMqDu03UM3saYtIQUzNJa-NO53FGfRf3wVYwDZ0zxC-AG_FDMTQHQ0jxBSbxUSi0pCiR6EkY2P_0zDeiHEr1ZJYDsi8v8_Xz2SgVWdTaw6hwblW2Klq-JTR73j1xfrt1cEY6p46AXyRUg%3Dw900-h600-k-no-pi-0.6030924589940696-ya81.95717524218193-ro0-fo100!7i8704!8i4352?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDMyNS4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

You mean this one? osm.org/way/1125471997

If so, no these are separated stones on a grassy surface, like said in the tag description in the wiki: "Commonly used for <…>, or areas to preserve the grass from being trampled"

Restored the "image" tag here:
* osm.org/changeset/152774253
* osm.org/changeset/152774137

No other items returned by your query contained "image" tag before.

@zstadler,
I'm not an expert OSM contributor, so I won't insist.

Is there any way to find all my edits where I deleted "image" tags? If not, I'm afraid I won't be able to find them all manually.

Regarding other elements: there should be a few (probably less than, say, 20) such elements; the problem is, I don't know how I can find them. The edits were done fairly long ago.

————————

Regarding multiple "wikimedia_commons" keys: osm.wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons says this:

If more images are available, just add the "best" one or create a new Wikimedia Commons gallery

Since "best" is subjective (which is actually mentioned as one of the drawbacks of using the "image" key), I'd prefer linking to a category or a gallery. This also covers the case that a "better" image is added there by a Commons user who is unaware of OSM. If there is more than one category that contains suitable images, the best option is probably to create a new category (if appropriate) or a gallery on Commons, and link to it.

————————

Keeping both "image" and "wikimedia_commons" keys: sounds to me like a fair solution for the time being.

Hi!

First, my apologies if my edits broke things…

Second, at the very beginning of osm.wiki/Key:image it says "the proposals for this tag were rejected due to several problems with the tag", and then lists a few issues which are fairly severe, to my opinion. On the other hand, using a pointer to a Commons gallery or category avoids most of these issues. So, I just followed with the approach that looked more correct to me.

הי! תודה על ההתראה.

Hi! No, it's not one-way – at least not in legal sense. I removed the tag.

Hi! I added wikimedia_commons tag which points to a category (that I created) that contains all images of the place I could find on Commons.

osm.wiki/Key:image#Unresolved issues points out a few issues with "image" tag, and I don't even know which software supports "image<something>" tags.

So I assumed that with the addition of "wikimedia_commons" it would be better to remove all "image" tags. But I'm not that experienced at OSM; if it would be better to have both, please re-add the image(s) that you prefer.

(@hatul) Oh, sorry for that, and thanks for fixing!

Should be fixed now. Sorry, I haven't noticed I have incomplete edits when uploading this changeset.