OpenStreetMap Logo OpenStreetMap

DonRoPLs Blogeintrag-Kommentare

Änderungssatz Zeitpunkt Kommentar
116160651 vor über einem Jahr

Hello, something seems to have gone wrong with your import of the hydrants. approx. 40% of the hydrants are entered twice. can you please take a look at this?

29735476 vor über einem Jahr

if the path is available and visible, it is correct to record it osm.

140254680 vor fast 2 Jahren

what does fire_hydrant:coupling_type=1 exactly mean?

92633265 vor fast 2 Jahren

ist ref:emergency correct? please check on ground

49730233 vor fast 2 Jahren

what does operator=g10 mean? in my opinion, this is not an operator. this is more the name of the building.

134479331 vor fast 2 Jahren

thanks, corected.

136799836 vor etwa 2 Jahren

Hi there-advertising,

a hydrant does not have a name, but a ref. please use the tag "ref" instead of the key "name".

ebnso use the tag "water_source" instead of the tag "fire_hydrant:water_source".

Please refer to the relevant wiki pages.

Would you please improve your tagging?

Bye
DonRoPL

125954920 vor etwa 2 Jahren

how can it be that they all have the same ref number = 97? something is wrong...

125954920 vor etwa 2 Jahren

Hi twil91,

no answer -> chance.

136274114 vor etwa 2 Jahren

Hi, what does "fire_hydrant:model" exactly mean?

93615044 vor etwa 2 Jahren

Hey,
what does the tag "emergency:lift" mean?

125954920 vor über 2 Jahren

Hi twill91

can you look again for the right tagging?

47772168 vor über 2 Jahren

Hey FeuerwehrSteinbergDGF,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers

43682669 vor über 2 Jahren

Hey twill91,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers

43683539 vor über 2 Jahren

Hey twill91,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers

43683157 vor über 2 Jahren

Hey twill91,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers

125954920 vor über 2 Jahren

Hey twill91,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers

126147683 vor über 2 Jahren

Hey twill91,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers

126151362 vor über 2 Jahren

Hey twill91,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers

134308781 vor über 2 Jahren

hi, thanks for your notice. it has already been changed.