I'm going to add landuse=residential back onto the outer way as the multipolygon relation has already been broken by someone deleting a construction area and also losing the outer way, which supports my harder maintenance prediction.

In some ways this is an unhelpful changeset as it wrongly drags the corners of one house to cover the two newly built ones as well, but it has at least brought to my attention that despite having surveyed the new builds that I have driven past twice today, and probably feature often on Mapillary, I hadn't got around to adding them. I'll fix them now.

Also reverting this for the secondary ways

also reverting this for the secondary ways that don't exist

Also reverting this for the secondary roads that don't exist

I will revert this for the fake secondary roads

I will revert this because of the imaginary secondary roads that have been added.

I'm going to revert this as it is adding trunk roads where there aren't any.

Just a quick note to say I like what you're doing, though I'm not sure I have the patience. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.9436718&lon=1.0833682&zoom=18

I'm reverting this changeset because merging the ways has messed up the PT v2 route relations that use this roundabout.

And in this changeset you have an inner touching the outer, which I think in theory makes it invalid (though at least this one still seems to render).

Personally, I think this was unnecessary and makes maintenance harder. There are also various self-intersections in the invalid multipolygon you created, so the residential area no longer renders. I'll try and fix them.

More and more driveways are getting added to OpenStreetMap, especially longer ones, as delivery companies are adding them to help their drivers. Adding gates as Bernard suggests (and access=private - I've passed the south end of the drive when walking between the Wooden Fender and the Lion) will help make sure this is right.

Ooops. I see you added the missing bit back. I'll sort out my mess...

Welcome to OpenStreetMap by the way - it might not have been clear that the one way represented two different things, but the more you edit the more you'll learn. Feel free to ask my anything (if I don't know then I might know where to point you instead). Best wishes, Ed

OK, I can see the problem. There were footpath tags on what should only have been marked as abandoned railway. I have restored the abandoned railway without the footpath tags, so it should no longer show as a footpath, but won't be a gap in the former railway line route.

It should be marked as private access if it is visible on aerial imagery. I will check and undelete if this is the case.

Hi Robert, Welcome from me too. If you switch on the optional notes overlay you'll spot this note which probably relates to the diversion. osm.org/note/1816071 I'm not entirely sure you're allowed to use the definitive map as a source, but the data is available under a compatible licence. See https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/open-data/
The GPS trace was probably one of mine from when I was planning (and testing and measuring) a pub walk some years ago http://www.tendringcamra.org.uk/rambale/#16/51.8832/1.1766 so I guess I'll need to update that route too, thanks. Best wishes, Ed

I'd have been tempted to use natural=grassland within a nature reserve, though they get rendered the same.

Hilly Fields is a Local Nature Reserve and is included in the data available from https://data.gov.uk/dataset/acdf4a9e-a115-41fb-bbe9-603c819aa7f7/local-nature-reserves-england