EdLoach 的留言
變更集 | 於 | 評論 |
---|---|---|
161128971 | 4 個月前 | Thanks. I'll just mark it open then. I only saw the headline on Facebook and locals moaning that it was pointless without additional improvements on Bramford Road. |
161128971 | 4 個月前 | Ipswich Star is reporting ribbon has been cut, so this might now be open? |
162927483 | 5 個月前 | Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed this test path (it worked - I could see it), and also tweaked the tagging on the tennis courts. Play structure doesn't really work for the lines, and some sites already automatically show them if the individual pitches are mapped (as they are now). See for example this from Openstreetmap France https://layers.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=19&lat=52.45933&lon=13.62264&layers=B000000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
|
162811062 | 5 個月前 | Thank you. I think from the changeset they might relate to this note osm.org/note/2325384 If I'm correct, can the note be closed do you think? |
161579906 | 6 個月前 | Hi, should the permissive path perhaps be foot=permissive rather than access=permissive, motor_vehicles=no (or can bicycles and horse drawn carriages also use the path)? |
161036969 | 7 個月前 | Are you sure it is this side of the road? From the address even numbers look to be opposite side of the road, and I'd guess it needs fitting in somewhere around Jennifleurs and Tesco Express. |
156372802 | 7 個月前 | I am not convinced that removing detail from a tag value is a "fix"? |
152623317 | 7 個月前 | The school wiki page seems to suggest leisure=recreation_ground (and although this has its own wiki page, the leisure=pitch wiki page says it is a tagging mistake and landuse=recreation_ground should be used instead). osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool |
152244692 | 10 個月前 | I only noticed because when I walk post postboxes with Mapillary running I tend to take a photo of the royal cypher in case it is missing, and was checking when I got home (it wasn't missing). https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=848234287500341 |
152244692 | 10 個月前 | Hi Robert. Do you think osm.org/node/11955885761/history/1 might be the same post box as osm.org/node/1387341180 |
50305661 | 10 個月前 | Hi. I can't find any record of The Supper Club being at this location. Do you have a link, or might it have closed since you named it? Thanks, Ed |
154738073 | 12 個月前 | I don't suppose you happened to check the road names when you were checking the speed limits? There is a notice in today's paper which has the order to make a 20 mph zone for Safrano Avenue, Armada Drive, Bettina Close, Ellna Road, and Nevada Close. Three of the names in the order differ from what is currently in OSM. Thanks. |
154010915 | 約 1 年前 | I just read https://www.harwichandmanningtreestandard.co.uk/news/24458480.manningtree-developments-new-junction-cycleway-footway-complete/ and see you got there already... |
150346802 | 超過1年前 | Firstly, it looks like I forgot the note URL in the changeset comment osm.org/note/4207472
|
124672835 | 超過1年前 | Would this be last September, by any chance? |
147370743 | 超過1年前 | I have reverted this changeset as there was no intersection. The footpath to the upstairs flats runs on top of the ground floor shops. I have added layer=1 to the existing level=1 to make this clearer. |
148913942 | 超過1年前 | I should add I *think* I went to survey the road end after the earlier changeset was created, and there is no obvious sign from Bentley Road, with the way as you've drawn it passing through a gate and a garage, iirc |
148913942 | 超過1年前 | You might find this changeset relates osm.org/changeset/136603258 |
147142835 | 超過1年前 | Not that one I think (at least I think I can see a lamp box in https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=783420368949832 ) |
147142835 | 超過1年前 | Well spotted. I'm glad my Mapillary imagery is useful. Looks like an old cypher (starting G), so I'm wondering if this postbox got moved when the post office moved. osm.org/node/1832001391 Will try and spot it on recent Mapillary images |