Switching to cycle map layer (for contours) it looks like many are, and some are slightly off. Source originally was one of these layers: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Haiti/VectorAndMapData#Public_Domain_CIA_Maps

I'll blame the new version of Vespucci. Thanks for letting me know - I'll watch out for it happening in future.

Hi there. I notice you've changed the name of St Andrew's Avenue to Clingoe Hill (which was already tagged as an alternative name in the alt_name I think, e.g. osm.org/way/327609649/history ). Has the road name been officially changed? The only street name signs I was aware of are those at the bottom of the hill where the dual carriageway meets the roundabout(s).

Quite possibly. One of my earlier attempts at editing using Vespucci and it looks like I amended from shop=alcohol to shop=bistro to worry about later (then forgot). I've changed it to a restaurant until I'm next out that way to check whether café might be more suitable.

I wish I had more time for doing edits. Not so much the editing itself, but collecting the data first. It would be great for example if all the shops in Colchester were mapped so if the Gazette run a story similar to "shop x has opened where shop y was" it would be a simple matter to update. I suspect for example we should retag W&G as Fenwick(s?)...

There's efficient - the Gazette reports that Taco Bell opens today and I went to see if the former Fabric 8 shop was mapped.

Also, has "The Filling Station" become "Beatles" - the FHRS data extract from yesterday suggests not?

Hi. I noticed your edit and thought maybe you'd like to also set "Allowed Access" to private as well as (or perhaps instead of) the name. This will cause the "P" shown on the standard rendering to be paler than public car parks.

Hi Patrick, Are you sure that the cafe is in this unit, and this cafe hasn't taken the place of the Sea Breeze cafe next door? (and next door to that the microbrewery has now moved, so thanks for the reminder I need to untag that...)

You have access to plans other than the copyright ones that are part of the planning application?

Then how have you surveyed the house numbers?

Hi. Are these houses really built already? When I last passed the ground was just about cleared but I don't think they'd even got foundations in.

Does this need to be two relations? If so should 6013575 also include way osm.org/way/400633328 like 6016446 does?

So should the amenity=place_of_worship tag across the road be on the whole of the church grounds rather than just the building?

The wiki suggests that amenity=pub should go on the node *or* the building. "If the whole building is used for this feature and its footprint is present in OSM, you can apply the tags on the area if you prefer" which is different to schools. osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub

Hi. Does this and your other changesets need amenity=parking tag adding? Best wishes, Ed
(Google Translate ) Hallo. Enthält diese und Ihre anderen Change brauchen amenity=parking tag hinzufügen ? Die besten Wünsche , Ed

I've had similar happen in the past when trying to upload large sets of changes and JOSM not getting confirmation of success for some reason, so I've tried again. Because it doesn't know the first upload was there it doesn't know that trying again will duplicate. I upload more frequently now to keep the changesets small, just in case.

Pretty sure I've now managed to de-duplicate using P2 manually.

I don't really know. I just happened to spot the deletion. Sometimes the OS retains historic names - perhaps that was the name before the Avenue existed? Anyway, there is a chance that as it was only added a few months ago that someone will spot it as missing and add it back again in future. It might be worth adding a node at that point with perhaps old_name (if appropriate) and note tags to let other mappers who are just looking at the OS layer and don't know the area know.

Does it not exist, or was it just spelled wrong? OS OpenData Streetview layer shows Harpesford marked at this point (not Hapesford).