Enock4seth's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
136494050 | about 2 years ago | this is very confusing, what are you really trying to imply here? |
136367667 | about 2 years ago | Use a semi-colon to separate multiple values, i.e. for the two phone numbers "+233208 20 80 53; +233242 83 67 58" instead of "+233208 20 80 53 or +233242 83 67 58". Also avoid putting full stops at the end of names, UEW doesn't really need to part of the name here too. Happy mapping! |
132403679 | about 2 years ago | there's definitely no bicycle parking on the building's corner. Be careful not to add redundant tags to building nodes. |
135995112 | about 2 years ago | there are island roads such as osm.org/way/1156987081 that leads nowhere and should be deleted or connected to nearest network if possible |
126757676 | about 2 years ago | map the footprint of building not every tiny change in the roof shape, can you try to fix osm.org/way/1098687481 |
133149799 | about 2 years ago | roads such as osm.org/way/1150302118#map=17/6.63657/-1.44363 leads nowhere and definitely not highway=unclassified. highway=track represents them more |
134554499 | about 2 years ago | use highway=residential instead of highway=unclassified highway=unclassified connects settlements, see osm.wiki/Tag:highway=unclassified?uselang=en-GB |
134754715 | about 2 years ago | when you map a multipolygon don't tag the inner building too as building=yes, such as osm.org/way/1161233472 |
134753976 | about 2 years ago | how sure are you this road exists osm.org/way/1161152172 ? |
134360347 | about 2 years ago | don't map island roads like osm.org/way/1158811740 , try to connect them to nearest ones |
134726425 | about 2 years ago | This osm.org/way/1161073395 doesn't look like it's connected. How sure are you about this ? |
136200004 | about 2 years ago | You seem to be mapping roads that don't exist, where is osm.org/way/1173606770 and osm.org/way/1173606771 from ? |
136203177 | about 2 years ago | How sure are you the this connecting exist? |
136204110 | about 2 years ago | you are representing "MSJ Advertising" several objects. Is the footway also owned by the you? Kindly delete the point and ways, only use one object to represent a feature; either a point or polygon, and that footpath isn't named after so remove the name too. |
81628925 | about 2 years ago | How can all these buildings be townhalls? the name tag is not for describing features, use the appropriate primary tag the represent the features your trying to map. the name is definitely not "townhall" or "public building" |
82014648 | about 2 years ago | How can all these buildings be townhalls? |
62963815 | about 2 years ago | I disagree with your idea of just painting spaghetti roads from old imagery as beneficial, they are completely useless. Does this serve your data needs well? There are many of such occurrences. I believe Ghana is not the only place with these results of previous mappings from your contributors. |
135649890 | about 2 years ago | Delete the tags in question from the objects with your preferred OSM editor |
63746988 | about 2 years ago | Mapping every tiny way from old imagery as residential roads is completely useless and doesn't help anyone. Kindly avoid this kind of remote mapping that is never fixed. This just burdens local mappers and every data user. |
63850928 | about 2 years ago | Aligning or mapping every tiny way from old imagery as residential roads is completely useless and doesn't help anyone. Kindly avoid this kind of remote mapping that is never fixed. This just burdens local mappers to-fix and every data user. |