OpenStreetMap
Fred Boniface's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Fred Boniface
| Id | Creator | Şınasnayış | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1863287 | RuudBaars | "this is the true location; the one that points to the garden is inaccurate and causes erroneous navigation"
|
|||
| 2013869 | Fred Boniface | I believe this path is blocked due to demolition of the adjacent building. Should it be marked as a closed road or removed from the map? |
|||
| 988869 | onosm.org submitted note from a business:
|
||||
| 1703318 | ndm | Missing road name? |
|||
| 1982818 | ndm | Needs a resurvey -- doesn't look like there are traffic lights here -- or a cycleway across the roads? |
|||
| 949671 | The George and Railway Hotel |
||||
| 1977922 | Nomadcyclist | 2nd bicycle shop |
|||
| 2013792 | Fred Boniface | What is the preferred way to label a railway junction? The point name used here 'Railway' is no longer available however many junctions have no single point at which they can be defined. |
|||
| 2013784 | Fred Boniface | The lines towards Filton are an abbreviated from of the individual line names (UFM - Up Filton Main, DFR - Down Filton Relief). However the lines towards Bath use the general route name (Great Western Mainline). What is the consensus over which naming scheme to use? Route names or individual line names, I can think of pro's and con's to each scheme so what do others think? At the very least I intend to change the abbreviations UFM, DFM, UFR, DFR to their full names for the moment. |
|||
| 530018 | chris_debian | 'Durnford Landrover' is mis-named, in the wrong position, and ceased trading several years ago. Suggest deletion. |