Hi guys. I took my time to look at all playgrounds with unusual tags to not miss any corner cases or other things that would require a closer look.

Look for example at the history of osm.org/way/770898831/history and the discussion of osm.org/changeset/81341526

Only playgrounds that were tagged with just leisure=playground + name=Spielplatz and other simple tags like access and surface were changed automatically.

My dear fellow mapper, your project is based on a handful of comments made over ten years ago, which as I mentioned in my first message here is out of date.

You seem ignorant that natural=water + water=river is valid tagging as approved in the same 2011 proposal, in current documentation and in popular tag usage.

You may wish to learn more about the current opinions of other mappers. Feel free to ask around in different forums and other platforms as listed in the community index: osm.wiki/Community_index

I would very much like to know of which lies exactly I stand accused here and what damage may be done by using the tagging scheme which you oppose. This information would be helpful if we are to continue this topic.

Dear Денис39 and Tomas Straupis,

I am greatly disappointed in Tomas' ad hominem fallacy. That is not a way to have a constructive discussion.

Tomas' page makes some claims that are not backed up by anything but your own words. It reeks of edit war.

To Tomas I would like to say that if they're looking for professional cartography, I kindly suggest that they do that outside this community which traditionally has always had a large number of amateur cartographers.

My apologies to Денис39 that they are now part of a seemingly unfriendly debate.

Best regards,

Intruder Ghost (as I have been called by Tomas before)

Tomas is stubbornly using an outdated tagging scheme that conflicts with the global river modernization project. See osm.wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization for more information about these efforts to unify river tagging.

Hoi borishag. Dit punt heb ik eerder bij jou aangekaart, dus Herrieman is in dit geval geen eenling. Op het forum is ondertussen een constructieve discussie gaande.

commentaar klopt niet. Moet zijn: "wikidata & rce tags Fort Blauwkapel"

Hoi Tilia_J. Ik woon hier vlakbij. Als je lokale kennis nodig hebt roep je maar ;)

Ik ben in Hulst geweest en van deze changeset kloppen inderdaad een paar dingen niet. Zie ook https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=842350

Interesting. I'll check it out as soon as I'm behind my pc. Thanks for the notification :)

That's a loose guideline rather than a hard rule, and there are other ways to validate map changes.

This changeset is not huge, it's only 95 changes within a very narrow theme.

I'm sorry to have inconvenienced you with this changeset, but there is nothing wrong with the content.

Thank you for picking up that task.

We're talking about 95 trees with deprecated tags here. Why would I discuss this again?

Thank you, ouleyang, for your contribution. If I can be of help with similar cleanups, I'm happy to lend you a hand.

Also, I would like to echo Mundilfari's message. You said that well.

Please excuse me for mistakenly press "upload all" instead of "upload selection"

Hoi TauvicR,

Het lijkt erop dat je hier een import hebt uitgevoerd zonder consensus van de Nederlandse OSM-gemeenschap. Zou je deze wijziging aub terug willen draaien en deel willen nemen aan de forumdiscussie per https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73583 ?

Alvast bedankt,

Casper

Dear Johnny Mapperseed,

It is a requirement of OSM that every community member communicates with fellow mappers, especially other local mappers who wish to discuss the quality of a changeset. Please consider my message a reminder that Korgi1 wishes to discuss some mapping practices with you.

Best regards,

Casper

Hoi CartoKees. Dankje voor je wijziging hier. Ik heb zelf best veel wijzigingen in en om Bennekom uitgevoerd, maar je hebt goed opgemerkt dat ik aan de dorpsranden wat details gemist heb.

Hey Lee. If you don't have anything productive to add, then I suggest that you map something instead.

Dear Lee Carré,

Your personal accusations don't mean anything to me either. That long message you sent me earlier was a lot more constructive, though, so I don't mind replying to that properly when I have the time.

Best regards

Casper

Hello Minh Nguyen

It's an interesting thought and I've already considered it. What you propose means that I have to check the same tags 50 times, which is an awful lot of extra work, and people would still complain that my changesets cover entire states while the clusters are in cities. My workflow would be slowed by a factor 50 and nothing would be gained from it.

These changes are very simple to scale up and uploading them in one changeset means that everyone only has to look at the changes once. Considering how many more of these tags exist globally, scaling up the only feasible way to do much-needed updates like this.

Best regards

Casper