Dieser Weg (Straße?):
osm.org/way/799476622
hat keine Eigenschaften. Ist das ein Fußweg oder eine Zufahrt?

fyi: I have moved the dragged ways back to their old position.

I created neither of the relations (only repaired the admin level of some segments). The relation, which is younger has more attributes. So I copied the attributes from the younger one to the one with the longer history and removed the younger relation.

I wanted to tell Laverock, that I have repaired the boundary relations.

I have removed the duplicate boundary on a duplicate river, which had less nodes than the new river drawn by you and corrected the boundaries (segments were not connected, missing outer role identifiers in relations).

I'm not Laverock and I don't use potlatch for the last ten years - only JOSM. I have removed the duplicate boundary on a duplicate river, which had less nodes than the new river drawn by Laverock and corrected the boundaries (segments were not connected, missing outer role identifiers in relations).

Hallo Arndt,
die Wege: Innenstadt - Bremen und Innenstadt - Lübeck hatte ich am 21. November wederhergestellt. Ebenso die Nutzung der südlichen Fahrspur aus Richtung Innenstadt bis kurz vor die abgerissene Brücke. Ich könnte in den nächsten Tagen dort wieder hinfahren, um den Baufortschritt zu dokumentieren.

Der Knoten, den ich entfernt hatte, ist vor fünf Jahren erstellt worden. Zum doppelten Knoten wurde er, weil der Verbindungsknoten zur nach Osten abzweigenden Straße vor einigen Tagen auf diesen Knoten verschoben wurde.
Wenn ich diesen CS mit achavi ansehe, sehe ich dass der Mapper die Straße nördlich dieses Kotens von secondary nach primary hochgestuft hat. Ob das so ausgeschildert ist, weiß er sicher besser.
Was hätte mir sonst noch auffallen sollen? Ich mache kein Changeset-review.

Diese Frage kann der Ersteller von Version 1 sicher besser beantworten.

The line across the golf course was not a road but the boundary between Vimont and Duvernay, which I have repaired.

I didn't decide to use the footway as boundary. Please ask the user, who has made the first version of way 755361820.

Thanks for this note. Ways and the background image can be aligned with GPS traces first, then the buildings.

Habe die Gebäude wieder zurückgeschoben, da die Bing-Luftbilder hier nicht so gut georeferenziert, wie z.B. die von Esri (die sind auch schärfer).

Some of the lonely nodes of this changeset are now used as nodes of buildings or other areas, but around this node ( osm.org/node/6584790489 ) there are many lonely nodes, which should be used for buildings or be deleted.

With Parkhaus 303 it looks like you have uploaded some levels multiple times, because I found the following ways of the north west spiral on top of each other, using the same nodes:
Level 2: 742978846, 742643120
Level 3: 742979579, 742967403, 742979267
Level 4: 742979685, 742979701, 742967354, 742979738
Level 5: 742979900, 742979974, 742979989, 742980023
Level 6: 742980124, 742980195, 742980160, 742980094
Since they all were uploaded with the same changeset, I think there was something wrong with your editor.
Also the staircases are duplicate in the same manner as the ways above.
Can you please repair this?

Wrong CS Comment (JOSM error), right is: Fixed gap in boundary relations

Is way osm.org/way/554279867 oneway or not? Same question to way osm.org/way/554279871

Sind die Fuß-/Radwege wie z.B. osm.org/way/459020469 und andere in dessen Umgebung nun Einbahnstraßen oder nicht?

Are the northern 50 metres of Calle Nueva oneway? Can you please correct this (oneway=yes;no).

You have uploaded with this changeset and the following ones about 67500 nodes to the eastern part of the town Mota del Cuerva, but the ways connecting them to buildings are missing. Can you please correct this.