Try this grid, Lucas: http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1509#task/62

As long as the data you're mapping is on-the-ground, and can be validated, i don't see why it should be a problem.

what do you mean by "this edition" and what "important study" are you referring to?

Hello Lucas. You might want to wait for the Paypay tasking before you update this area, which should utilize the new MapGive imagery.

Am glad to see you still mapping!

If you're looking for mapping tips, check out the wiki pages:

* [PH Mapping Convetions] (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions)
* [Good Practices] (osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
* [Learn OpenStreetMap](http://learnosm.org)

For questions or concerns, you may reach out to other OSM-PH contributors through any of the following:

* [Discourse Chat](https://goo.gl/X2XeQE)
* [OpenStreetMap Help Chat](http://is.gd/askosmph)
* [OSMPH on Slack](https://osmph.slack.com/home)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB community](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Goolge Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)

We all look forward to more edits from you. Please feel free to get in touch any time.

Regards,
GOwin

Here, check out an existing route:
osm.org/relation/4515959

Cool! I hope you'd complete the Green Frog bus route relation, too. :)

For your reference: osm.wiki/Public_transport#Buses

If you need anything, ping other mappers for a hand:
* [Chat Room](https://goo.gl/X2XeQE)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB community](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Goolge Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)

Are you sure about that tag for a "stage"? A public building looks alright, but a `shelter` doesn't look appropriate.
amenity=shelter
name=Stage
shelter_type=picnic_shelter

In the Philippines, a "stage" is probably best tagged as amenity=theater.

See: osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtheatre

@rukku
Kindly do the revert. Thanks.

@rokku

highway=bus_stop tags are not incorrect, and is usable for routing apps and software.

If this node is also a shelter, simply add:
shelter=yes

Removing bus_stop is unnecessary. Kindly revert, and simply add the shelter tag.

For reference, see: osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop

Thank you.

Rukku,
are you taking out the operator tag because it's not Meralco's?

Name tags are not necessary to tag features, so there is no need to add them, as is the case here.

In an ideal network route map, both physical railways can be added. But, taking advantage of the flexibility of OSM relations make this unnecessary.

I hope I understood your question correctly. Thank you.

@vichwinn

re nodes tagged as `public_transport=stop_position` are not, at all, superfluous. It may appear like that in OsmAnd (which, btw, I use and recommend, too) but those nodes are functional and exist in the real world, and follows the OSM precept of `one feature, one element`.

The only reason those "dots" are not visible in other stations is that they haven't been mapped yet. Besides, we never, ever should map for the "renderer."

The mapping process is never complete, and the OSM platform generously allow us to store these data, even if they're considered as work in progress.

As for the case of stations being stop positions by default, that is not always a safe assumption. We have (or used to? I dunno these days) LRT "express trains" that only load/unload passengers on select stations. A *completely* tagged public transport route, can make use of stops, routes, trips, schedules, etc. to develop "ideal" routes. OSM data is not just used for rendering maps, they are also usable for many other routing apps - elements of which are not always visibly apparent for other users - but the data, the building blocks are there.

If you feel this case needs to be discussed more extensively, we have several community channels where this can be done:

* [Chat Room](https://goo.gl/X2XeQE)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB community](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Goolge Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)

Kindly consider reverting the affected changesets.

Nice to see you mapping again, Mars. :) Happy new year.

Hi Albayano. Kindly spell out "St." as "Street", per OSM naming convention, we don't abbreviate. See here for more: osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Don.27t_use_abbreviations

You may reach out to local mappers over several channels:
For questions or concerns, you may reach out to other OSM-PH contributors through any of the following:

* [Chat Room](https://goo.gl/X2XeQE)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB group](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Goolge Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)

Happy new year!

Hey. If you want to chat, you can join some of us OpenStreetMap users here: https://discord.gg/0fRISIZ8VwKNK70q

Yes, many commercial imagery providers have very strict licenses. That's why I'm curious because they may have issues with the OpenStreetMap licensing.

Can you tell me about your workflow?

Can you direct me to a link to the Terms of Use for Birdeye imagery? I'm curious about their data licensing terms.

Nice one! Thanks.