The name "Barangay road" is unnecessary, unless there's a proper name.

To indicate administrative responsibility, add the tag
designation=Barangay
to the way.

The node "Barangay Tara Boat Landing" may also be deleted. That's the purpose of a pier, which you already added on the map.

Sipag ah. :)

Hi there ! Looks like you're off to a good start. Thanks for your data contribution to OSM.

By the way, you don't have to add the same name for every school building within the school grounds (e.g "Puguis Elementary School"). You only need to put the name on outer object (the school grounds) .

If you're looking for mapping tips, check out the wiki pages:

* [PH Mapping Convetions] (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions)
* [Good Practices] (osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
* [Learn OpenStreetMap](http://learnosm.org)

For questions or concerns, you may reach out to other local mappers through any of the following:

* [OpenStreetMap Help Chat](https://is.gd/askosmph)
* [OSMph on Slack](https://is.gd/osmphchat)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB community](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Google Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)

We all look forward to more edits from you. Please feel free to get in touch any time.

Regards,
GOwin

For planning and visualization, please use sites like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr or http://www.bikemap.net/en/

The basemap is still OpenStreetMap, and you don't have to modify the data in any way that will affect the live data sets.

If you need assistance, ping us at http://is.gd/osmphchat

That's https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ or http://www.bikemap.net/en/

Please don't tag this route as a highway. Temporary events shouldn't be put on the map this way.

Consider umap.openstreetmap.fr www.bikemap.net/en/ for this purpose.

Congrats! Keep it up.

use tag:
sport=multi

to describe facilities for multiple sports.

This particular user has been noted to have made similar edits in the past. See result of the edits before the revert: http://i.imgur.com/Uc4RvtI.png

Hi there ! Looks like you're off to a good start. Thanks for your data contribution to OpenStreetMap.

If this is a school, you should tag it as `amenity=school` to cover the school grounds, and each building will be traced and tagged with `building=school`. It would also be helpful to leave change set comment that describe the edits you just did.

If you're looking for mapping tips, check out the wiki pages:

* [PH Mapping Convetions] (osm.wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions)
* [Good Practices] (osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
* [Learn OpenStreetMap](http://learnosm.org)

For questions or concerns, you may reach out to other local mappers through any of the following:

* [OpenStreetMap Help Chat](https://is.gd/askosmph)
* [OSMph on Slack](https://is.gd/osmphchat)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB community](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Google Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)

We all look forward to your new edits. Please feel free to get in touch any time.

Regards,
GOwin

Great work! Keep it up.

Some tips:
- Spell names in full, do not abbreviate (e.g "Nat'l" for National, or "Elem." for Elementary)
- Tag acronyms as short_name, and use the full name of the establishment for name tag

If you need any help, hangout with us at https://is.gd/osmphchat or https://is.gd/askosmph

Hello. Congratulations on your new edits!

To make more change set comments useful, how about writing something like "digitized building", or "traced commercial building" instead of a vague "First digitized"?

Kindly refer to osm.org/changeset/37558311 for the modifications I made. And to the osm.wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area as reference for detailed mapping of protected areas.

Also, the Lifecycle Prefix tags: osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Thanks for the contribution. Keep on mapping!

... based on the Senate bill.

Also, perhaps you would consider reverting the AMWS boundaries back to version 1, then create a new boundary tagged with a `proposed:` prefix

Thank you for the prompt response. Much appreciated.

I brought this changeset to the attention of some of the local OSM mappers and mentioned that it's premature to modify the boundaries based on a bill. Please check out the `proposed:` life cycle tag prefix which seems appropriate in this case: osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

With reference to Agusan Marsh, as a protected area, the Ramos-era Executive Order is the prevailing law, and defines the AMWS boundary.

The marsh, as a natural feature, is still undefined until we obtain better data or imagery.

Please join the informal, online discussions of the local OpenStreetMap community at http://is.gd/osmphchat

Sorry for the short reply. I'm mobile. I'll elaborate when I get back to my computer.

What do you mean by your "Fix me" comments? What kind of help do you need?

Hello. Can you provide a link to your source?

This appears to be just a *bill* and is not a law, and will not have any legal weight.

Hi Eli. It's not necessary to tag hydrants with name, like
name=Hydrant

For details, check out:
osm.wiki/Tag:emergency=fire%20hydrant

Great to see you using OsmAnd now. :)

What are the sources of these edits?