Thanks for your reply. I am not out for copyright violations, but just wondered how such a remote and exposed path found its way into OSM. Whenever you add a path in mountaineous regions that is not suited for tourists and children, you should add a [osm.wiki/Key:sac_scale sac_scale] tag. Good apps like Komoot then will warn, while your climbing path is described as "Mostly accessible paths". I have been alerted because a young trailrunner has disappeared (and truly has fallen to death) using your path: [https://www.argophilia.com/news/johann-williams-still-missing-in-crete/240344/], [https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61573093363960]. I guess it did not happen on your path, but on the well-tramped descent to Xyloskala, but anyhow he thought he was running on a comfortable round-trip path.

You have added the path #521921266 on Crete. What is the source for this path? Have you walked it yourself? How would you estimate the difficulty (sac_scale)? Would you recommend it to normal tourists? osm.org/way/521921266#map=14/35.26479/23.92964&layers=C

Thank you for adding the note.

You are playing with the life of unexperienced hikers. Such trails are for well-prepared experts (like you), but not for common OSM users. You should have added at least the warning you have sent to me.

What is the source for this path? Did you walk it yourself? A few days ago a German hiker ended here in serious trouble and died: https://www.gmx.net/magazine/panorama/sechster-wanderer-griechenland-gestorben-vermisst-39806926
Experienced mountaineers report there is no path here but dangerous cliffs and scree only: https://www.levka-ori.com/phpBB3/viewforum.php?f=10

I had the same idea in the beginning, but OSM consensus is that guideposts are *beside* the path. Node networks are now very popular in Central Europe most for hiking and cycling (see osm.wiki/Node_Networks, osm.wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging). For a rendering example see https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?relations=22327,2595546,8334326,9629629,11146857,1664664&map=16.0/60.8096/8.9915 (for testing purposes I have tagged a few nodes as "rcn", although the Golsfjell network is defined per community, thus "local". Unfortunately the map only show "rcn", the tagging standard in Netherlands, not "lcn"). Also note the guideposts *beside* the path.
On Golsfjellet we have node networks not only for hiking and cycling, but also for skiing. Thus I have proposed (and practiced) to extend the node network tagging scheme ("lsn_ref" for local skiing network); see osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Node_Networks#Skiing. "lsm_ref" is a typo; thanks for the hint. What additional tags are you thinking about?

Uups, one should not do tagging when hungry. Thanks for review, Gerd

Hallo thisss, da ich gerade versuche, den Bus von Chania nach Paleochora einzuzeichnen, bin ich an Deinen Bushaltestellen sehr interessiert. Wie wurden sie gemessen (im Bus?), liegen sie alle Richtung Chania? Gibt es wirklich zwei Stopps im kleinen Dorf Voukolies, wobei der Pin von KTEL genau zwischen den beiden liegt? Weißt Du die Namen?Hast Du weitere Infos? Manches bei KTEL ist sehr konfus. Gruß,
Gerd

Es geht nicht um "schick", sondern forward/backward ist bei ptv2 einfach falsch, siehe z.B. https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/HH/DE-HH-HVV-Analysis.html. Aber wenn Du die Linien nach Sterley aufräumen willst, halte ich mich da fern

Sorry, wrong comment. Should read: ZOB refined / Survey

Nein, es ist ein kleiner Test rund um "mein Hotel". Zum Hintergrund siehe osm.wiki/Talk:Piste_Maps#Network_and_node_points
Auf dem Golsfjell orientiert man sich im Sommer und Winter mit getrennten Knotenpunktensystemen. Ich wollte mal schauen, ob die Renderer schon auf das Tag reagieren. Über die beiden Punkte G51 und G53 werde ich vorerst keine weiteren lsn_ref setzen.
Gruß
Gerd