please review:
the prefix addr:* should not be used with highways,
use is_in:* instead.
The value for addr:country is a two character code, means, addr:country=RS

please review:
the tag addr:country needs a two-character code, so it should be addr:country=TW

please review:
the addr:country value should be US, not USA

please review:
way 110469325 has invalid tags
highway=unclassified;tertiary
surface=unpaved;paved

bridge=yes is not true for the whole road

please review:
way 43990277 has the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;tertiary

it seems that all roads in this area are either unclassified or tertiary, but I don't
see a difference between them, so I think
more work is needed ;-)

please review this change:
the way 33094208 now has
the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;tertiary
Please check also the exact spelling of the name. The addr nodes along the road say "Rang des Côté", the road
is "rang des Côtés" or unnamed

please review:
way 28820834 has the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;tertiary

please review:
The way has now the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;tertiary

please review:
way 38480159 has invalid tag
highway=track;service

okay, thanks, I will do that

please review, this change
produced lots of invalid highway
tags like
highway=tertiary;secondary;residential
on way 115627297

please note:
a roundabout like way 359694581
should be tagged
junction=roundabout
highway=residential
The roundabout is a oneway,
so please also check the
direction

please review:
way 307305267
is uncommonly tagged
"highway=proccessed" .
maybe is that meant to be
"highway=proposed" ?

please review
osm.org/changeset/34599146
maybe these buildings are
amenity=parking
parking=multi-storey

please review uncommon highway tag
for ways 347403817 and 347403814

please review way 283527988

Bitte prüfen:
(way 374819333)
highway=bollard sollte wahrscheinlich barrier=bollard sein? Gehört dann aber
auf den node eines highway

please review, many large roads have
now the invalid tag
highway=primary;trunk
or other combinations of tags

okay, up to now I just use it to confirm what I found in Bing images. If I see a road name
sign or a house number in StreetView, is it allowed to use that info?

please review:
is it okay to remove power_source=wind_generators now?
JOSM produces warnings for these objects